|
|
|
|
| A sad day for Republicans [message #99712] |
Mon, 05 July 2004 15:09   |
 |
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Yeah...a whole ton of anti-french drivel is born of ignorance. For one, when the French surrendered, they really didn't have a huge choice during WWII. The blitzkrieg had never really been witnessed before, so the French rolled all their tanks right up to their border and figured to make an unassailible fortification. Then the Germans came in huge numbers, rolled through the line, and by the time word got out to other parts of the line, Germans were already behind them. Even then, when the French had to help the Germans as part of a surrender agreement, most French commanders of naval units sunk their ships instead of firing on the Allies.
And during the Revolutionary War, the French gave the U.S. big-time help, as mentioned above.
| sw33t |
and believe that kerry is a pot smoking nazi who sleeps with MJ
|
I don't think you actually know anything about Keryr except maybe what your blindly Republican parents tell you.
By the way, your story sucks.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A sad day for Republicans [message #99916] |
Tue, 06 July 2004 12:52 |
Grendies
Messages: 8
Registered: February 2003
Location: Richmond, VA
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
This week on "When Stereotypical Gits Come Out" we'll be seeing how the Propagandious-Believicous makes mistakes common to it's species. Our host Grendies will provide commentary and light discussion on said mistakes:
Grendies: Crikey! Take a look at this one mates, e's got jaw muscles that could rip ya in 'alf! Don't get too close now, Propagandious-Believicous get real fighsty when aggravated! Whoop! Watch out, e's rearin 'is 'ead round! Take a look at the white pasty coloring under 'is chin!
---
I for one ama RepublicanCongratulations, your "W00t Rep!" badge is waiting for you at the Information Desk in the lobby.[/MST3K]. I cna say that Kerry supports nothing the United states does.you're absolutely right, assuming you're excluding the approximate half of the country that would rather vote for him than for Bush[/MST3K]he would rather give nukes to the french and have them.Really? I haven't seen anything to suggest that...[/MST3K]
Tell me are the french our allies,NOCare to explain that? There's signed documents labeling them as allies, and until something official is made saying otherwise I believe you're BSing...[/MST3K],we saved thier asses in ww1 and 2Yep, along with several other countries.[/MST3K],we went to war with Iraq once,Did the french help us,NOOk, so they didn't want to risk getting shot at for doing something they didn't want to do, there's nothing saying they had to attack Iraq if they didn't want to.[/MST3K],they would rather watch us go to war them when kerry gets into office they nuke us and take overO.o Dude, you are one paranoid little twerp.....[/MST3K],i personally think that i have a million other people who have my back on this oneGiven the millions upon millions of people living in the US I bet that there's a safe bet that there's enough paranoid people who also support the Republican party to reach more than a million.[/MST3K].on a more personal note,i bet u a democrat made the movie and thinks he can meake a great president look badPossibly, but I've yet to see anything that Bush (assuming that's the president you're referring to) has done that could be called "great" if you consider the outcomes in their entirety[/MST3K].more than have the presidents were Republicans and they have the drive to become succeful in lifeCare to provide us with your definition of success? And I'm assuming we're excluding successes that required one's fellow citizens to suffer.[/MST3K].political ideas are based on what u believeYou don't have to be head cashier at the local Wal-Mart to figure that one out <_<[/MST3K] and believe that kerry is a pot smokingYou know Bush was into that kind of stuff too, maybe using drug-references to support Bush isn't the best of ideas.[/MST3K] naziAh yes, the Nazis, the people who gave us the original Homeland-Security (who's job was to search for and remove political dissidents, among other things....kinda like the modern US Department of Homeland-Security 'cept now days they're less open and aggressive...it should be noted that whoever suggested that name for the US DHS should have been smacked for being a moronic git), the people who set up their country so that civil rights were all but non existent (akin to the effects of the Patriot Act and the abilities of the Department of Homeland-Security), the people who's political goals took on a religious like attitude (interesting how Bush mentioned in a speech that this was a crusade *Bush's speech writer has lost -10 respect!*).[/MST3K] who sleeps with MJMJ? Michael Jackson? What on Earth does he have to do with this?[/MST3K]
---
And don't even think about accusing me of being a Democrat. The Democrat party is a whiny group of idiots and liberal extremists. The Republican party just happens to be just as bad albeit on the other end of the spectrum (short tempered idiots and conservative extremists).
Bush is a fascist git who's administration is comparable to that of the Nazi government and who's intelligence and wit is only that of an imbecile.
Kerry is no doubt a fool and would likely continue to make things worse for the country just as much if not more so than Bush if voted into office.
Either way this country is going to have another 4 years of embarrassment and hardship thanks to incompetent national representation and leadership.
Thank you for being with us ladies and gentlemen, see you next time on "When Stereotypical Gits Come Out"!
[}~{]
If you're considering the war in Iraq a great accomplishment, then I beg to differ based on the fact that it was poorly planned. Any idiot can take out an army if all they have to do is push a big red button labeled "LAUNCH" in bold letters, but one needs to consider the possible outcome of said pushing and plan out what one's actions will be after one pushes the button.
[}~{]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A sad day for Republicans [message #100676] |
Fri, 09 July 2004 17:51 |
 |
Crimson
Messages: 7429
Registered: February 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars)
ADMINISTRATOR |
|
|
I got my political beliefs from my dad but it wasn't because he imposed them on me... I asked, he explained. The extensive research and news following that I've done since then only cements my beliefs.
I'm the bawss.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A sad day for Republicans [message #101041] |
Mon, 12 July 2004 08:40 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Well, someone oold enough to vote would also have had to go through at least 2 years of high school, which involves 2 years of language arts classes, where they teach you how to spell and use punctuation and things like that.
Also, from your July 10th post, i don't think you have any comprehension of the issues. It's probably a good thing that you choose not to vote.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
| A sad day for Republicans [message #101085] |
Mon, 12 July 2004 11:10 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Once again supporting my point that you have no comprehension of the issues.
Why will Bush probably win if he's so low in the polls? Oh well, 6 months ago, Bush was up over Kerry. Well, there aren't 6 more months for the polls to switch again. And North Carolina just had their biggest political rally ever for Kerry.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
| A sad day for Republicans [message #101098] |
Mon, 12 July 2004 12:01 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Except Kerry/Edwards is 12 points above Bush in the polls.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
| A sad day for Republicans [message #101106] |
Mon, 12 July 2004 12:23 |
|
Crimson
Messages: 7429
Registered: February 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars)
ADMINISTRATOR |
|
|
No, he isn't. Usually the announcement of the VP causes a candidate to jump 10-12 points, but in Kerry's case it had little to no effect.
I'm the bawss.
|
|
|
|
| A sad day for Republicans [message #101125] |
Mon, 12 July 2004 14:47 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
If you listen to the incorrect polls on FOX News, then yes, it had no effect. If you listen to the actual polls, then it had roughly a 12 point jump.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A sad day for Republicans [message #101451] |
Wed, 14 July 2004 13:48 |
NHJ BV
Messages: 712
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| Crimson |
Look, Clinton stood idly by while Islam-based terrorists continually attacked US interests and it culminated on 9/11/01 when they killed nearly 3000 innocent Americans. Unlike Clinton, Bush is doing something about it. It is sheer, blatant, unadulterated stupidity and ignorance to think that we should just sit here with our thumbs up our asses and continue to allow these psychopaths to kill us. QED
|
To come back on this two-week old post, I just saw an interview with Clinton by the Dutch news/actualityprogram Nova (Clinton was in Holland today for his book) and Clinton said that under his administration twenty Al-Qaeda cells were dissolved, the same amount as has been dissolved since 9-11. That's not what I call standing idly by.
|
|
|
|
| A sad day for Republicans [message #101787] |
Thu, 15 July 2004 19:02 |
|
Crimson
Messages: 7429
Registered: February 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars)
ADMINISTRATOR |
|
|
Yeah, and Clinton is a known liar. I would need more proof than what that man says.
I'm the bawss.
|
|
|
|
| A sad day for Republicans [message #103493] |
Fri, 23 July 2004 08:01 |
 |
ViperFUD
Messages: 69
Registered: April 2003
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| Grendies |
Bush is a fascist git who's administration is comparable to that of the Nazi government
|
Godwin's Law. Game over.
http://info.astrian.net/jargon/terms/g/Godwin_s_Law.html
And shepherds we shall be,
For thee, my Lord, for thee.
Power hath descended forth from thy hand;
That our feet may swiftly carry out thy command.
And we shall flow a river forth to thee,
And teeming with souls shall it ever be.
|
|
|
|
| A sad day for Republicans [message #103503] |
Fri, 23 July 2004 08:16 |
mahkra
Messages: 219
Registered: April 2004
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| Crimson |
Yeah, and Clinton is a known liar. I would need more proof than what that man says.
|
And Bush is a known idiot. Is his word worth anything to you?
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
