|
|
|
|
|
Hey Liberals... [message #98905] |
Fri, 02 July 2004 11:13 |
|
Crimson
Messages: 7429 Registered: February 2003 Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars) ADMINISTRATOR |
|
|
LOL this guy does detailed research and you say "it's just one of those economic cycles"... I think he's got a little more credibility when it comes to economics.
I'm the bawss.
|
|
|
|
Hey Liberals... [message #99041] |
Fri, 02 July 2004 18:26 |
|
Crimson
Messages: 7429 Registered: February 2003 Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars) ADMINISTRATOR |
|
|
[list]
[*]The Federal government won its suit against Microsoft. This put a measurable damper on enthusiasm for big-cap technology stocks and funding for new tech ventures alike.
[*]Legal assaults led to the abrupt shutdown of Napster, the single largest consumer of bandwidth for two years running. This temporarily flattened demand, as the precipitous demise of the lead consumer of any commodity would. Probably more than any other single event, this served to puncture the photonics/telecom boom.
[*]An agreement to let oil prices rise was reached with Russia in 1999 as incentive for good behavior in the Kosovo conflict. The consequent spike in fuel prices in the Spring and Summer of 2000 prompted the Federal Reserve to initiate a spectacularly ill-advised series of interest-rate hike, just as the $2 trillion bill for the dot-com bubble was coming due.
[*]Ill-advised remarks by the top political leaders of the U.S. and U.K. sank the biotech market overnight in 1999. Only recently has this market become favored for venture investment.
[*]The State of California hit the wall when open-door immigration policies finally intersected long-term political infrastructure limitations, prompting production shutdowns, skyrocketing costs and general unpredictability in the world’s fifth-largest economy, and the largest technology market for both production and consumption.
[*]As financing disappeared, infrastructure-intensive firms like broadband and wirelessconnectivity providers, long-haul and metro-area networkers and server-hosting farms suddenly found their business plans— predicated on biannual infusions of hundreds of millions of dollars— suddenly lacked oxygen years before their customer base could support them.
[*]Y2K concerns pulled significant infrastructure spending into mid/late 1999, leaving something of a hole in spending plans for the following year.
[/list:u]
You honestly mean to tell me that not a single one of these events had any impact on the economy?
I'm the bawss.
|
|
|
|
|
Hey Liberals... [message #99123] |
Sat, 03 July 2004 01:26 |
|
Crimson
Messages: 7429 Registered: February 2003 Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars) ADMINISTRATOR |
|
|
I worked for Charles Schwab for 3 years. I was immersed in the stock market, talking to traders as they placed their trades. Somebody sneezing could change the markets. I remember once an analyst set a price target for Qualcomm at 1000 points and it gained like 200+ points in a single day just because some bitch thought it would get that high. It doesn't take much to impart huge change.
I'm the bawss.
|
|
|
|
Hey Liberals... [message #100041] |
Wed, 07 July 2004 03:53 |
NHJ BV
Messages: 712 Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
Crimson | I worked for Charles Schwab for 3 years. I was immersed in the stock market, talking to traders as they placed their trades. Somebody sneezing could change the markets. I remember once an analyst set a price target for Qualcomm at 1000 points and it gained like 200+ points in a single day just because some bitch thought it would get that high. It doesn't take much to impart huge change.
|
But that works both ways. So the only thing we're getting to here is that the economy is indeed easily shaken and that the ups and downs are indeed a natural cycle.
|
|
|