Command and Conquer: Renegade Official Forums: Tactics and Strategies

Home » Renegade Discussions » Tactics and Strategies » agt vs obelisk

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

agt vs obelisk [message #-974382]

Mon, 15 April 2002 09:47

Anonymous

If there were several AGTs/Obelisks, the games would have to be at least an hour long (unless one team stunk). Would it even be possible to take them down without a massive hotwire-in-APC rush? 3 Obelisks would kill even the most determined Mammoth rush. Wait, maybe WW should make "weak points" on obelisks and AGTs if there are a couple per map, like a point on the structure where 2-3 hits will kill it. (Making yet another use for the sniper rifle)

[ April 15, 2002: Message edited by: Corsair_734 ]

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		agt vs obelisk By: Anonymous on Sun, 14 April 2002 15:07
		agt vs obelisk By: Anonymous on Sun, 14 April 2002 15:14
		agt vs obelisk By: Anonymous on Sun, 14 April 2002 21:18
		agt vs obelisk By: Anonymous on Sun, 14 April 2002 21:53
		agt vs obelisk By: Anonymous on Mon, 15 April 2002 09:47
		agt vs obelisk By: Anonymous on Mon, 15 April 2002 10:50

Previous Topic:	Why does nod always have to rush?
Next Topic:	Put c4 next to your beacon/nuke!

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Jan 31 06:02:58 MST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00801 seconds