I was... First of all, I do not like the idea of 2 sniper classes, But I will admit with the Creation of Air Vehicles Ramjet Rifles are definatly the way to go for anti-Air

But the PISydney/raveshaw and Mendoza/mobius, and The Snipers are Completly Mirrored... and thats Something I thought Pretty Crappy of Westwood... at Least Raveshaw and Sydney carry 2 differnt weapons, But Mobius and Raveshaw Both Carry the Exact same Named weapon and Look... But the Lazer is a Differnt Color...

I take this as a Chicken **** way out of balancing, But I understand looking at all the Other C&C games that westwood Pretty much needs this way out or there could have been some Major problems

No, I'm not disappointed. I think that the game has a great deal of diversity. Complete diversity doesn't make sense in war. In real wars of history, the enemy backward engineers the enemy's equipment. I don't see why it would be so different here.

I guess what I'm saying is that while I like the diversity of the units, I'm a little surprised that GDI didn't find a way combat the flame-tank with some kind of armor-piercing explosive gun. It would seem to me that they would have keyed into how terribly powerful the flame tank was and built a way to stop it. I'd pay 1500 for an infantry unit or 2000 for a tank that could rupture the fuel armor for the flame-tank guns. Don't get me wrong, I love using the thing, but it is too powerful. Maybe that's why they decided on the same weaponry for snipers, because some previous weapon on one side was just too much.