Command and Conquer: Renegade Official Forums - RDF feed
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
been on a uk tour for a couple of weeks, just skimming the mudkips/jarhead thread few points - jarhead is a sad excuse for an admin. yes i do know what i'm talking about here and yes i am not exaggerating; he's a cantankerous bully - mudkips is much worse than jarhead. his comments about jarhead's military service would be disgusting enough even if i wasn't expecting them, which i was. see the Syria thread on the jelly forum; see the sheer contempt he has for the syrian people who keep getting shot and beaten to a pulp by the regime, a regime he enthusiastically praises for doing so - iran is a deranged compulsive liar with a vendetta he can't drop against someone who never provoked him in the first place
pretty accurate, though Crimson kinda jumped the gun a bit in banning MUDKIPS from here (he didn't even do anything here at first; though of course he started ban evading and shit, which, then it was warranted)
It's hard to say I jumped the gun when I was proven right to be proactive in removing him. Be forewarned, I locked this topic for a reason... don't expect this one to stay open for long.
u missed the fact i might be needing u on ren to own some people in a funwar
at one point Prulez proved Crimson a liar but she removed his proof and claimed he faked the logs i'm not at all surprised by that move but it saddens me that she's basically our main contact with EA at this point and now apparently she removed her post after his post, so the topic ends there: http://www.renegadeforums.com/index.php?t=msg&th=38731&prevloaded=1& rid=22260&start=75
then Prulez made a topic asking why his post was removed/modified, which was locked. days after being locked the topic was deleted, hmm.
it's her forums, she can run them how she wants same goes for misusing mod commands during n00bparty events so her renegade team can prosper since it can't do so legitimately and you should be grateful i would appreciate it if on the banner it said Crimson's Renegade Forums since they are subject to her rules and don't necessarily represent renegade as a whole
liquidv2 wrote on Fri, 18 November 2011 15:52 [color=skyblue]same goes for misusing mod commands during n00bparty events so her renegade team can prosper since it can't do so legitimately Quote: i would appreciate it if on the banner it said Crimson's Renegade Forums since they are subject to her rules and don't necessarily represent renegade as a whole
I think ACK is starting to crack under the pressure of the overwhelming stupidity that emanates from the inner workings of this forum. We are going to need a contamination team soon if things continue.
serious business, or common sense?
My point is that it's a forum for a dead game. You're making complaints about a dead game's server moderator and said dead game's forum operations. These complaints would have been relevant years ago, back when this forum had more than 15 posts per day. What difference does it make getting worked up, at all, over this dumb Internet shit? At this point in the game's life, you should be happy that anyone bothers to do anything for it at all. The damn thing was left to rot many moons ago. I suppose I could always join in on the pointless bitching though. /#OCH OCCUPY CRIMSON'S HOUSE AT N00BPARTY //MAKE PEOPLE GET MAD OVER RENEGADE ///WATCH THEM STAY MAD YEARS LATER ////UHUHUHUUHUH
People play it. It isn't dead. If it was dead, no one would be playing it. It doesn't have as many people as it used to, sure. But there are more than enough people for there to still be full matches. And as long as you can have one full match at any point in the day then the game isn't dead. You can only play on one server at a time. You can't be in two places at once. So what difference does it make if there is 1 full server or 30?
No matter how much you convince yourself otherwise, this game has been dead for the past several years. Its mods are dead, as well. More dead than the game they're based off, even. It's dead, Jim. /Having 10 players every so often does not make it "alive" //Having official support, with a fanbase that isn't retarded constitutes a game that's alive ///Slashies
interesting that you still produce maps for this "dead" game. for once in your life stop being a troll and remove yourself from crimson's fat ass.
i'm not mad nor was i ever mad, i just heard about it and laughed some people just do silly things
liquidv2 wrote on Fri, 18 November 2011 19:23 i'm not mad nor was i ever mad Quote: interesting that you still produce maps for this "dead" game. for once in your life stop being a troll and remove yourself from crimson's fat ass. Yes, I do. The line of work I'm planning to be in is military simulation and synthetic environment modeling. Renegade's dated visuals help provide a consistent development challenge akin to creating work for real-time simulation development. In other words, STFU. Also, regarding "Crimson's fat ass", she's one of my best friends online. I've known her since the first beta in 2001. I don't always agree with how her server is run, but I don't post shit-fits about what Jarhead does. Think about that for a bit.
Aircraftkiller wrote on Fri, 18 November 2011 18:54 No matter how much you convince yourself otherwise, this game has been dead for the past several years. Its mods are dead, as well. More dead than the game they're based off, even. It's dead, Jim. /Having 10 players every so often does not make it "alive" //Having official support, with a fanbase that isn't retarded constitutes a game that's alive ///Slashies I'm not convincing myself otherwise. Halo 2 on Xbox is a dead game. Renegade is not.
We can agree, at the very least, that Renegade in its current condition is similar to a patient in the hospital with terminal brain illness. It may not be "dead" yet but it might as well be.
you can tell me i'm mad all you want, it doesn't change the fact that i'm not i wasn't a part of n00bstories or exodus, i'm just stating the obvious silly abundance of trees enthusiast!
this map sucks there's not enough trees
Airshitkilla your map is awesome! People who criticize it are just stoopid! And thank god you don't allow criticism of your map! i love rollin thru da woods my nigga! so much fun when you crash into a thousand trees before you reach the other base! and then since FPS is so low.. it makes the experience even better! your map is fucking fresh dood keep doin work!
lol people discussing photos of others with no photos of their own to critique it's almost like being in a basement prevents you from having a face you'd want to post
ACK, I normally respect you and all, but you're not offering much of a counterargument, and acting kind of like what you'd expect someone like me to act like.
does posting irrelavent pictures with phrases like 'umad' mean the person your directing it at is mad, or are you indeed yourself, mad? i hope the grammar makes 'umad'. it doesnt matter how good of friends you are, you clearly have your head so far up that ass its unhealthy, probably for both of you honestly... and your saying a terminally ill patient 'might as well be dead'. Fuck id hate to be your elderly relatives.....well, relative at all tbh. and i concur with appshot, the only thing that could possibly make fjord better is more trees. Who the fuck needs fps anyway when you got fucking tress. Trees are the shit, infact why cant you ust get all the standard map and fill them with trees everywhere. itl give rene a new lease on life!
liquidv2 wrote on Sat, 19 November 2011 07:47 Sorry but LMAO! That is all.
Also @ Spoony; To answer your question :- I don't know how long you were away for so ill run off a few things some of which you may already know. 1) TT released a second public beta. 2) ACK made yet another version of his self proclaimed Best ren map. 3) Xpert destroyed his community that he tried so hard to 'keep alive' 4) My offer to host a cw.cc server is still there if you want it. 5) Im being sued by the DMCA or so ive been told, Isn't that right Xpert.?
Seriously guys, I know this is the heated discussions subforum but still... Removed some of the worst spam, now please keep a tiny bit of decency.
Goztow wrote on Sat, 19 November 2011 08:11 Seriously guys, I know this is the heated discussions subforum but still... Removed some of the worst spam, now please keep a tiny bit of decency. Assclown.
Goztow wrote on Sat, 19 November 2011 07:11 Censored some of what I don't like, now please keep a tiny bit of decency.
appshot wrote on Sat, 19 November 2011 01:51 Airshitkilla your map is awesome! People who criticize it are just stoopid! And thank god you don't allow criticism of your map! i love rollin thru da woods my nigga! so much fun when you crash into a thousand trees before you reach the other base! and then since FPS is so low.. it makes the experience even better! your map is fucking fresh dood keep doin work! Holy fucking fuck! It's been a while since I've seen anyone really try and step up to me. Let's do this thing. As stated many times, I actively encourage criticism. What I discourage is "hurr i haet teh map cuz i cant use teh haevoc on 0rcas loolll" or anything similar to it. If you can prove your point in a legible manner, I'm quite open to changing gameplay ideas. I've even solicited them, too. But wait, you don't read that stuff, do you? Must be too hard. ;-( Hey, those woods you speak of? See, the same thing happens in real life. Ever try driving through the woods? You get hung up on shit. Try using the roads, bro. I know that requires "thinking" (How does it work?) and "logic" but hey, you could even ignore logic and take a stroll through the shallow river. There are three easily accessible, non-forested areas for you to travel through with a vehicle. They make it easier for infantry to survive in the open. They're not meant to be vehicle-friendly. Must be too hard to understand. ;-( I will concede that the framerates are a problem, but only if you're running a system that was built in 2003 to 2005. If you're using a system that old, please explain to me why it's my fault that you feel compelled to play my work and whine about it. I'll gladly read any of your obviously well thought-out responses on the matter! Liquid: <3 I'm sorry for trollin' you bro. You know I heart you. At least, now you do. FlaminGunz: If I call you mad, that means I'm mad? What the fuck, is this third grade's opposite day on Wednesday? "NO YOU'RE MAD BECAUSE IT'S OPPOSITE DAY LOL YOU SAY I'M MAD BUT IT MEANS YOU'RE MAD LOLOL" I hate to dispel your lovely illusion that my head is planted inside Crimson's rectum, since it's such a tantalizing vision of where I'd love my head to be right now. You know me all too well. Unfortunately, the reality is that Crimson and I disagree on a lot of things, while simultaneously agreeing on others. We're friends. We do that. Do you have friends? Do you have any that you care about enough to stick up for against e-thugs like yourself? Keep thuggin' bro. You're so eloquent. Also, it would be great if you'd quote what I actually said, instead of what you think I said. I said "terminal brain illness", not "terminal illness", which is a completely different thing. If you have a terminal brain illness you might as well be in a vegetative state. Or would you prefer to live like Terri Schavio? Shaitan: Re: Irony /#OCH OCCUPY CRIMSON'S HOUSE AT N00BPARTY //MAKE PEOPLE GET MAD OVER RENEGADE ///WATCH THEM STAY MAD YEARS LATER ////UHUHUHUUHUH
This thread takes me back. It reminds me of the way things used to be years ago. All we need is someone to claim some metal textures look like concrete and we'd have the 2004 Mod Forum.
not liking the trees or fps being too low is still a valid criticism. look up what criticism means. you actively enoucrage criticism? HA keep posting ur bullshit. Also, renegade isn't meant to be realistic... i thought you would be smart enough to realize this. nice faulty the map itself isn't even a realistic battle map if its intention was even suppose to be realistic. analogy there. also my laptop isnt from 1980s dood. i bought it a year ago. i dont feel compelled to play it, just sharing my criticism of your map, which you can't accept. i like your diction, though! words like obvious legible and all that bullcrap. have you taken a rhetoric class or something? anyway here's some advice: take ur giant fat head out of your asshole.
ur posts are bad... yea its criticism, u deserve it, look it up. check and mate, game and match.
Quote: All we need is someone to claim some metal textures look like concrete and we'd have the 2004 Mod Forum. Spoony hasn't missed much Unrelated but... forests do have trees you know :Something about a tree falling and making a sound thing here:
appshot wrote on Sat, 19 November 2011 16:47 not liking the trees or fps being too low is still a valid criticism. look up what criticism means. you actively enoucrage criticism? HA keep posting ur bullshit. Also, renegade isn't meant to be realistic... i thought you would be smart enough to realize this. nice faulty the map itself isn't even a realistic battle map if its intention was even suppose to be realistic. analogy there. also my laptop isnt from 1980s dood. i bought it a year ago. i dont feel compelled to play it, just sharing my criticism of your map, which you can't accept. i like your diction, though! words like obvious legible and all that bullcrap. have you taken a rhetoric class or something? anyway here's some advice: take ur giant fat head out of your asshole. Yes, I actively encourage criticism. As I've stated many times. Hey, even from the original post of Fjords: Quote: It was a pleasure working with everyone, I appreciate all of your bug reports and nitpicking. Your help made this become a reality. Must be too hard for you to bother substantiating your posts with evidence, though. ;-( Regarding "criticism", you're giving me negative criticism. This is fine, it's the way you choose to express yourself. I am giving your criticism my own negative criticism. This is the way I choose to express myself. If you wish to discuss the merits of the work I've designed, and the problems you feel that it has, I am more than willing to listen to you. I am not interested in doublespeak that attempts to disguise shitty criticism with actual helpful advice, which could be used to improve your gameplay experience and help you stop complaining. I'm not sure what you're talking about when you mention "not a realistic battle map". It's not meant to be a "realistic battle map", it's meant to be a highly detailed (for Renegade, anyhow) outdoor environment that resembles a Norwegian fjord. I haven't taken any "rhetoric class" - I am simply a person who reads often and uses words to express what I feel, instead of consistently relying upon catch phrases and simplistic language.
I think what people mean to say is that they are displaying their criticism, yet no actions are being taken on it.
I don't respond to "omfgr orc4 suxxxx" nor do I respond to other similarly worded, poorly thought-out complaints. I do respond to people explaining why they think something is wrong and I will listen if I can find a way to reconcile what my vision of gameplay is with what they're requesting, as I've done many times. http://www.st0rm.net/forum/showthread.php?17547-Fjords-game-play-explanation In reference, check that out.
Aircraftkiller wrote on Sat, 19 November 2011 18:53 It's not meant to be a "realistic battle map", it's meant to be a highly detailed (for Renegade, anyhow) outdoor environment that resembles a Norwegian fjord. appshot wrote on Sat, 19 November 2011 00:51 and then since FPS is so low.. it makes the experience even better! your map is fucking fresh dood keep doin work! Aircraftkiller wrote on Sat, 19 November 2011 18:53 highly detailed appshot wrote on Sat, 19 November 2011 00:51 FPS is so low.. Toggle Spoiler
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlation_does_not_imply_causation In this case, it's due to several factors: I didn't feel like using Renegade's outdated visibility system. It would have taken up my computer for at least 24 hours. There's some technical aspects to it as well, such as the fact that I didn't combine all of the trees into individual meshes. I kept them as separate objects to cast shadows on dynamic objects. If I make another version of Fjords, it'll have optimized tree geometry along with some other optimizations. There's more to it than that, though, and I'm not sure what it is. It probably boils down to this being a shitty old engine that doesn't utilize multiple core processors or properly use the GPU/available RAM. Regardless, the fact that only a handful of people experience "massive framerate losses" is more likely attributable to them having inferior hardware than anything else. So, in summation: Quote: FPS is so low.. Quote: Your computer sucks..
Aircraftkiller wrote on Sat, 19 November 2011 21:44 There's more to it than that, though, and I'm not sure what it is. It probably boils down to this being a shitty old engine that doesn't utilize multiple core processors or properly use the GPU/available RAM. it probably boils down to there being way too many fucking trees
its my damn hardware conjuring up all those fucking trees. God damnit, how do i disable 'clusteruck of trees' in my win7 control panel?
Repeating "trees" ad nauseaum does not make your point for you.. Oh wait, I see what's happening here. Good one, boys, you got me.
if you make a map and it runs like shit for 90% of renegade you might want to consider changing the map rather than simply telling 90% of renegade to get better computers so they can handle your map i'm one of the 10%, and i approve this message
Since when do you speak for 90% of the users who play? It's more like a vocal minority of players. I'm not interested in toning down the details I've put into this just so some people stop whining about their old Dell systems from 2003 having problems. It's 2011, if you can't run a level that was designed using a computer built in 2007 you might want to reconsider PC gaming. In all fairness, though, I am looking into seeing if the "combined meshes" technique will improve frames. If it isn't the trees causing the problem then I'll have to dig deeper into this.
dig deeply enough to uproot most of the trees that could fix the problem as well
I'm not removing the trees So posting snarky two-liners isn't going to change anything
can you move them out of the way and up on the mountains then
I could move your house up there. We could shell it for extra points.
It's hard as balls to make a decent looking Ren map with any kind of detail without it raping your FPS. The trees look nice, but damn, Ren was not made to handle it.
replace the trees with ice flows and call it glacier mkII, different map, same problems... and i liked the dig deep enough to uproot the trees 2 liner
Liquedv2, yew need to branch out a little on your thinking. I'm sure you'll twig it soon enough, but you're barking up the wrong tree. The map is budding with new ideas and great game-play, AitcraftKiller just has to get to the root of the problem, it seems to have him pretty stumped right now. Leaf him alone, he's doing a good job. I'm going to go out on a limb here, and say this map isn't fir you. Anyway, this thread is really starting to lumber along, all this over some sap's map? I thought the game was dead, but this thread at least is poplar. It makes me pine for the days of yonder. At the end of the day, life's a Beech.. Who wood of thought it?
^ LOL Anyways is it possible for a different clients to have different versions of the map, but retaining the same filename as so they can play it in a server with everyone else - HD version(normal) - LQ version(poo pc people) LQ + HD people play together
The computer hardware is NOT the problem. I have a rather high end system and my FPS is still around 35 on that map. I play BF3 on highest settings. Also LOL @ Reborn!
I think I speak for everyone when I say that there is a problem with the trees. I think we need more trees.
Goztow wrote on Sun, 20 November 2011 10:54 The computer hardware is NOT the problem. I have a rather high end system and my FPS is still around 35 on that map. I play BF3 on highest settings. It's Renegade's engine- it's not made to deal with higher detail. It needs a lot of tinkering to get it to work reasonably with anything higher than its default stuff, really.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTFP9QQzEL4
reborn wrote on Sun, 20 November 2011 05:54 Liquedv2, yew need to branch out a little on your thinking. I'm sure you'll twig it soon enough, but you're barking up the wrong tree. The map is budding with new ideas and great game-play, AitcraftKiller just has to get to the root of the problem, it seems to have him pretty stumped right now. Leaf him alone, he's doing a good job. I'm going to go out on a limb here, and say this map isn't fir you. Anyway, this thread is really starting to lumber along, all this over some sap's map? I thought the game was dead, but this thread at least is poplar. It makes me pine for the days of yonder. At the end of the day, life's a Beech.. Who wood of thought it?
since a lot of ppl still work and play ren and otters games based in this engine, is it posible to imprube it so it can handle more detailed grapics?
yes, that was covered in other posts in threads and even in this one if people would just read through it. reborn, that was just incredible, good work.
liquidv2 wrote on Sun, 20 November 2011 15:24 reborn wrote on Sun, 20 November 2011 05:54 Liquedv2, yew need to branch out a little on your thinking. I'm sure you'll twig it soon enough, but you're barking up the wrong tree. The map is budding with new ideas and great game-play, AitcraftKiller just has to get to the root of the problem, it seems to have him pretty stumped right now. Leaf him alone, he's doing a good job. I'm going to go out on a limb here, and say this map isn't fir you. Anyway, this thread is really starting to lumber along, all this over some sap's map? I thought the game was dead, but this thread at least is poplar. It makes me pine for the days of yonder. At the end of the day, life's a Beech.. Who wood of thought it? Genius, absolutely genius.
Hall of Fame?
While reborn's post was rather amusing, I don't think anything in this thread qualifies as HoF material. It's certainly not on the level of "I DESLIKE YOU".
Give it about 10 more pages. Where is dogtree when you need him?
Aircraftkiller wrote on Sun, 20 November 2011 23:05 While reborn's post was rather amusing, I don't think anything in this thread qualifies as HoF material. It's certainly not on the level of "I DESLIKE YOU". lol, I thought it was quite clever.
I don't get unplayable performance on Fjords.. but it is definitely poor performance in some locations. Around the 10-20 FPS range. It isn't my computer because I can play BF3 with nearly all Ultra settings with a smooth frame rate. Granted BF3 can better make use of multiple core technology... I think some stuff should still be optimized to fix the lower FPS areas of the map.
R315r4z0r wrote on Mon, 21 November 2011 12:10 ... I think some stuff should still be optimized to fix the lower FPS areas of the map. Toggle Spoiler ?
liquidv2 wrote on Mon, 21 November 2011 20:04 R315r4z0r wrote on Mon, 21 November 2011 12:10 ... I think some stuff should still be optimized to fix the lower FPS areas of the map. Toggle Spoiler ? lmao
lmao Liquid you have put many smiles on my face during this thread.
does this map suck as much as glacier flaying?
^ cut it here before my post and hall of fame it
Rocko wrote on Mon, 21 November 2011 23:34 does this map suck as much as glacier flaying? Glacier flying is actually the best map. Please don't compare this map to glacier. Thanks.
He just made sure there would be enough trees after I join the map
@ACK so you are saying we need to buy new computers to play your maps? Map needs more bloom and more trees! Shit even make it rain for the lol's!
Upgrading, not a bad idea... http://www.n00bstories.com/image.fetch.php?id=1361054783
Big Mak wrote on Wed, 23 November 2011 13:04 @ACK so you are saying we need to buy new computers to play your maps? Map needs more bloom and more trees! Shit even make it rain for the lol's! It's 2011. If your system sucks, don't cry to me about it.
i think the problem is that renegade cant make good use of multy core prosesors so as someone stated above, having a desent computer doesnt help much.
yeah, so as a result it's like trying to shove a fully grown pine tree down a garbage disposal
liquidv2 wrote on Wed, 23 November 2011 17:57 yeah, so as a result it's like trying to shove a fully grown pine tree down a garbage disposal hundreds of pine trees
It runs great on my computer, I find that most of the time if I see lag in renegade its when my CPU gets too busy... of course now that I have a quad core i7 with 3.4Ghz a core and 3.8GHz turbo it doesn't happen anymore, but it did when I had an i5 with only 3.2GHz per core. Aircraftkiller wrote on Wed, 23 November 2011 14:10 Big Mak wrote on Wed, 23 November 2011 13:04 @ACK so you are saying we need to buy new computers to play your maps? Map needs more bloom and more trees! Shit even make it rain for the lol's! It's 2011. If your system sucks, don't cry to me about it. In all fairness, you are working on an engine that was made back in 2001; I'd suspect that a fair number of the people that still play on the engine might be just because their hardware can't handle anything better. Perhaps make the trees just go invisible at a certain distance via LOD, some of the older cards could have issues with alpha blended textures... or the grouping trees idea into a single mesh (still with load of course) could also hugely help. Keep in mind after all, a lot of the better games out there have some very aggressive LOD systems, some of them even deploy it on terrain.
So basically, but an i7 to play Renegade, otherwise you can't play 1 map out of the lots. p.s death_rally.mix, best map out there, shits on everything, can play it on a microwave, yes yes add to the servers asap
Quote: (23:38:57) <St0rmServ> [Team]: [dragon]ly8366: i need help !!!!!!!!!!! my ocra in tree and cannt move !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (23:39:04) <St0rmServ> [Team]: [dragon]ly8366: need a ocra help me (23:40:56) <St0rmServ> [GameInfo]: Playing on map: C&C_FjordsTR.mix Quote: (23:41:35) <St0rmServ> [CMPS.]Knight: maybe its fps lag? (23:42:15)<St0rmServ>: Aircraftkiller: Stop trolling and play, dumbshit
Quote: (23:38:57) <St0rmServ> [Team]: [dragon]ly8366: i need help !!!!!!!!!!! my ocra in tree and cannt move !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (23:39:04) <St0rmServ> [Team]: [dragon]ly8366: need a ocra help me (23:40:56) <St0rmServ> [GameInfo]: Playing on map: C&C_FjordsTR.mix Quote: (23:41:35) <St0rmServ> [CMPS.]Knight: maybe its fps lag? (23:42:15)<St0rmServ>: Aircraftkiller: Stop trolling and play, dumbshit I got you covered buddy.
liquidv2 wrote on Sat, 26 November 2011 00:01 Quote: (23:38:57) <St0rmServ> [Team]: [dragon]ly8366: i need help !!!!!!!!!!! my ocra in tree and cannt move !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (23:39:04) <St0rmServ> [Team]: [dragon]ly8366: need a ocra help me (23:40:56) <St0rmServ> [GameInfo]: Playing on map: C&C_FjordsTR.mix Quote: (23:41:35) <St0rmServ> [CMPS.]Knight: maybe its fps lag? (23:42:15)<St0rmServ>: Aircraftkiller: Stop trolling and play, dumbshit
don't mess with my favorite vegetable, Doitle.
liquidv2 wrote on Sat, 26 November 2011 05:01 Quote: (23:38:57) <St0rmServ> [Team]: [dragon]ly8366: i need help !!!!!!!!!!! my ocra in tree and cannt move !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (23:39:04) <St0rmServ> [Team]: [dragon]ly8366: need a ocra help me (23:40:56) <St0rmServ> [GameInfo]: Playing on map: C&C_FjordsTR.mix Quote: (23:41:35) <St0rmServ> [CMPS.]Knight: maybe its fps lag? (23:42:15)<St0rmServ>: Aircraftkiller: Stop trolling and play, dumbshit Liquid you need to stop everytime I see you post in this thread I laugh.
Well, your standards aren't exactly that high... I mean, you think Glacier Flying is the best thing out there. That doesn't speak highly of you.
Aircraftkiller wrote on Sat, 26 November 2011 17:54 Well, your standards aren't exactly that high... I mean, you think Glacier Flying is the best thing out there. That doesn't speak highly of you. 1) I wasn't speaking to you. 2) Glacier is the best map. It has its bad parts but for gameplay its awesome. 3) Im entitled to my opinion, dont like it? Put me on your ignore list. No loss for me.
Are you really trying to tell me who you were s... Wow, that's got to be the shittiest defense of an opinion I've seen this month. First of all, if you don't want someone to talk to you or discuss your opinions, don't post. Second, Glacier Flying is not "the best map". You sound like the customer in the iphone 4 parody. "What the hell entices you about the god damn iphone, if you don't mind me asking?" "It's the best phone." Yes, you're entitled to your opinion. That is not a defense of what you think. If you can't be bothered to explain why you think the way you do, why even post anything at all? To quote Maddox, "you should stop whatever it is you're doing and start plowing fields, because you lack the ability to form language ... and are therefore a cow."
Aircraftkiller wrote on Sat, 26 November 2011 19:23 Are you really trying to tell me who you were s... Wow, that's got to be the shittiest defense of an opinion I've seen this month. First of all, if you don't want someone to talk to you or discuss your opinions, don't post. Second, Glacier Flying is not "the best map". You sound like the customer in the iphone 4 parody. "What the hell entices you about the god damn iphone, if you don't mind me asking?" "It's the best phone." Yes, you're entitled to your opinion. That is not a defense of what you think. If you can't be bothered to explain why you think the way you do, why even post anything at all? To quote Maddox, "you should stop whatever it is you're doing and start plowing fields, because you lack the ability to form language ... and are therefore a cow." What? I have explained to you and whoever else why I think Glacier_Flying is the best map. Not my problem if you disagree with it. You haven't asked me to explain why I think the way I do in here so wtf are you talking about?
Exactly my point, you don't even understand what I'm saying. I've made it obvious to anyone who can think beyond simplistic terms. I'll lay it out for you. You posted something I disagreed with. I posted my disagreement. You posted "it's just my opinion", essentially. I posted that I know it's your opinion by virtue of you being the person that posted it, and that you aren't defending what you think by saying "it's my opinion". Get it now?
I know what you said however you never asked me to defend my point. I wasn't aware I had to explain myself to you.
man, start this at 00:28: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NpmMZygFZsc it's a movie representation of ACK trying to attack your opinion
liquidv2 wrote on Sat, 26 November 2011 13:54 man, start this at 00:28: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NpmMZygFZsc it's a movie representation of ACK trying to attack your opinion not enough trees and explosions
The point is, Renegade's trees are invincible, god like even... So there, ruined for all.
liquidv2 wrote on Sat, 26 November 2011 13:54 man, start this at 00:28: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NpmMZygFZsc it's a movie representation of ACK trying to attack your opinion Clever sir.