Command and Conquer: Renegade Official Forums - RDF feed
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Combat Testing getting ready for the Open Beta of Medal of Honor. Wanna join is? Sign-up at https://www.combattesting.com. Starting soon!
Medal of Honor! Oh man, it's like it's 2002 all over again!
LOL medal of duty is da best game ever u can shoot ppl fuk da haterz gb2 ur stupid mmorpg WoW shit LOL grind some more nerds ROFL lmao People actually think this way
MOHAA was a blast; you could have some real fun in multiplayer. This game looks like it's going to be SUPR SRS though.
GEORGE ZIMMER wrote on Tue, 15 June 2010 23:16 LOL medal of duty is da best game ever u can shoot ppl fuk da haterz gb2 ur stupid mmorpg WoW shit LOL grind some more nerds ROFL lmao People actually think this way runescap > u fgt stfu n00b
nikki6ixx wrote on Tue, 15 June 2010 22:23 MOHAA was a blast; you could have some real fun in multiplayer. This game looks like it's going to be SUPR SRS though. It was a blast, by the standards of the time. Then Call of Duty 1 and 2 came along.
Dover wrote on Wed, 16 June 2010 00:07 nikki6ixx wrote on Tue, 15 June 2010 22:23 MOHAA was a blast; you could have some real fun in multiplayer. This game looks like it's going to be SUPR SRS though. It was a blast, by the standards of the time. Then Call of Duty 1 and 2 came along. Call of Duty has pretty much been bland, generic shit since it came into the gaming industry.
GEORGE ZIMMER wrote on Wed, 16 June 2010 00:08 Dover wrote on Wed, 16 June 2010 00:07 nikki6ixx wrote on Tue, 15 June 2010 22:23 MOHAA was a blast; you could have some real fun in multiplayer. This game looks like it's going to be SUPR SRS though. It was a blast, by the standards of the time. Then Call of Duty 1 and 2 came along. Call of Duty has pretty much been bland, generic shit since it came into the gaming industry. Lol, someone is upset. Or they've only played the awful Call of Dutys like CoD 3 or Big Red One or World At War and all that bullshit.
IMO Call of Duty sucks these days. The real older once werent that bad. Battlefield gets a big from me but it lacks the close combat city stuff online. This is why im atleast going to test MoH because it doesnt has the crappy shit from CoD and not only open warfare as battlefield. And yay for using dice's frostbite destruction in MoH (Maybe not 100% utilised as in Battlefield but destruction is destruction (what CoD obviously lacked))
GEORGE ZIMMER wrote on Tue, 15 June 2010 23:16 LOL medal of duty is da best game ever u can shoot ppl fuk da haterz gb2 ur stupid mmorpg WoW shit LOL grind some more nerds ROFL lmao People actually think this way The epitome of console gamers. Also, I see what you did there. (Highlight) [quote title=GEORGE ZIMMER wrote on Tue, 15 June 2010 23:16] People actually think this way
Dover wrote on Wed, 16 June 2010 02:59 Implying I haven't played CoD4 and CoD6 and genuinely disliked them
GEORGE ZIMMER wrote on Wed, 16 June 2010 06:56 Dover wrote on Wed, 16 June 2010 02:59 Implying I haven't played CoD4 and CoD6 and genuinely disliked them lolwut
George, knock off your gay shit. You used to be a good poster, but since you discovered 4chan, you are fucking lame.
Just FYI, you can use your C&C 4 Beta codes to get into the MoH beta. just download the installer from here: http://www.filefront.com/16781471/Medal-of-Honor-Multiplayer-Closed-Beta/
and enter your C&C 4 beta keys here : www.medalofhonor.com/beta
bakerrrr wrote on Sat, 19 June 2010 08:49 and enter your C&C 4 beta keys here : www.medalofhonor.com/beta no..its used
Worked for me yesterday, thanks
Glock wrote on Fri, 18 June 2010 22:10 George, knock off your gay shit. You used to be a good poster, but since you discovered 4chan, you are fucking lame. oh no I said something bad about MW2 better call the WHAAAAmbulance by the way, I've known of 4chan longer than that, dildo
GEORGE ZIMMER wrote on Sun, 20 June 2010 19:09 Glock wrote on Fri, 18 June 2010 22:10 George, knock off your gay shit. You used to be a good poster, but since you discovered 4chan, you are fucking lame. oh no I said something bad about MW2 better call the WHAAAAmbulance by the way, I've known of 4chan longer than that, dildo When did I say anything about mw2? Regardless, you're still acting retarded, and it's inappropriate to act like a /b/tard here.
I love MW2. It's probably the only multiplayer game I've played in months. (except for the Halo: Reach beta)
BC2 is much better than mw2 and so far moh looks like it's just a bc2 mod.
MOH:(something, is there even a subtitle?) looks good, but plays very averagely like many other multiplayer modes of FPSes that don't seem to throw much focus onto any specific area of the game. I think it probably looks great on the showroom but there's nothing more to it. MW2 does multiplayer much better, and possibly single-player as well. Speaking of MOHAA, I'm installing the demo from the Renegade disc just to see what it was like back then
You know it's a sad day when you can't discuss a single FPS without bringing up that sad excuse of a game that is MW2.
Glock wrote on Mon, 21 June 2010 17:52 You know it's a sad day when you can't discuss a single FPS without bringing up that sad excuse of a game that is MW2.
I didn't like any of the other MOH games, how much better is this game in comparison?
My experience so far: WASTE OF TIME... I should've played Renegade or Bad Company 2. Perhaps that if I would've had MW2 that would've been an alternative as well.
EvilWhiteDragon wrote on Tue, 22 June 2010 05:27 My experience so far: WASTE OF TIME... I should've played Renegade or Bad Company 2. Perhaps that if I would've had MW2 that would've been an alternative as well. Completely agree. Also, the chat feature seems to be borked in the beta, so it feels like I'm playing with a bunch of bots. No FPS nowadays seems to do socialising and community building as good as Renegade. I don't know about Battlefield because I don't play it but attempting to make any friends online in MW2 is a complete fail mainly thanks to the lack of dedicated servers.
nopol10 wrote on Tue, 22 June 2010 02:01 EvilWhiteDragon wrote on Tue, 22 June 2010 05:27 My experience so far: WASTE OF TIME... I should've played Renegade or Bad Company 2. Perhaps that if I would've had MW2 that would've been an alternative as well. Completely agree. Also, the chat feature seems to be borked in the beta, so it feels like I'm playing with a bunch of bots. No FPS nowadays seems to do socialising and community building as good as Renegade. I don't know about Battlefield because I don't play it but attempting to make any friends online in MW2 is a complete fail mainly thanks to the lack of dedicated servers. I also wonder why I haven't found a server that switches map every so much rounds. I guess that feature isn't done yet
EvilWhiteDragon wrote on Tue, 22 June 2010 14:40 nopol10 wrote on Tue, 22 June 2010 02:01 EvilWhiteDragon wrote on Tue, 22 June 2010 05:27 My experience so far: WASTE OF TIME... I should've played Renegade or Bad Company 2. Perhaps that if I would've had MW2 that would've been an alternative as well. Completely agree. Also, the chat feature seems to be borked in the beta, so it feels like I'm playing with a bunch of bots. No FPS nowadays seems to do socialising and community building as good as Renegade. I don't know about Battlefield because I don't play it but attempting to make any friends online in MW2 is a complete fail mainly thanks to the lack of dedicated servers. I also wonder why I haven't found a server that switches map every so much rounds. I guess that feature isn't done yet AFAIK MoH has only 1 map per gametype at this moment xD
Sounds like another hurrdurrr game, sadly. Come the fuck on, game industry- step shit up. Make a Renegade 2 or something.
GEORGE ZIMMER wrote on Tue, 22 June 2010 16:41 Make a Renegade 2 or something.
Omar007 wrote on Tue, 22 June 2010 16:24 EvilWhiteDragon wrote on Tue, 22 June 2010 14:40 nopol10 wrote on Tue, 22 June 2010 02:01 EvilWhiteDragon wrote on Tue, 22 June 2010 05:27 My experience so far: WASTE OF TIME... I should've played Renegade or Bad Company 2. Perhaps that if I would've had MW2 that would've been an alternative as well. Completely agree. Also, the chat feature seems to be borked in the beta, so it feels like I'm playing with a bunch of bots. No FPS nowadays seems to do socialising and community building as good as Renegade. I don't know about Battlefield because I don't play it but attempting to make any friends online in MW2 is a complete fail mainly thanks to the lack of dedicated servers. I also wonder why I haven't found a server that switches map every so much rounds. I guess that feature isn't done yet AFAIK MoH has only 1 map per gametype at this moment xD Well, then switch gamemodes every 2 or something rounds... It can't be that hard....
EvilWhiteDragon wrote on Tue, 22 June 2010 20:16 Omar007 wrote on Tue, 22 June 2010 16:24 EvilWhiteDragon wrote on Tue, 22 June 2010 14:40 nopol10 wrote on Tue, 22 June 2010 02:01 EvilWhiteDragon wrote on Tue, 22 June 2010 05:27 My experience so far: WASTE OF TIME... I should've played Renegade or Bad Company 2. Perhaps that if I would've had MW2 that would've been an alternative as well. Completely agree. Also, the chat feature seems to be borked in the beta, so it feels like I'm playing with a bunch of bots. No FPS nowadays seems to do socialising and community building as good as Renegade. I don't know about Battlefield because I don't play it but attempting to make any friends online in MW2 is a complete fail mainly thanks to the lack of dedicated servers. I also wonder why I haven't found a server that switches map every so much rounds. I guess that feature isn't done yet AFAIK MoH has only 1 map per gametype at this moment xD Well, then switch gamemodes every 2 or something rounds... It can't be that hard.... It indeed shouldnt but i guess the hosters are only intrested in 1 particular gamemode xD Im kinda wondering whether its already there... It seems to have been made on the same engine as BFBC2 xD
Omar007 wrote on Tue, 22 June 2010 20:30 EvilWhiteDragon wrote on Tue, 22 June 2010 20:16 Omar007 wrote on Tue, 22 June 2010 16:24 EvilWhiteDragon wrote on Tue, 22 June 2010 14:40 nopol10 wrote on Tue, 22 June 2010 02:01 EvilWhiteDragon wrote on Tue, 22 June 2010 05:27 My experience so far: WASTE OF TIME... I should've played Renegade or Bad Company 2. Perhaps that if I would've had MW2 that would've been an alternative as well. Completely agree. Also, the chat feature seems to be borked in the beta, so it feels like I'm playing with a bunch of bots. No FPS nowadays seems to do socialising and community building as good as Renegade. I don't know about Battlefield because I don't play it but attempting to make any friends online in MW2 is a complete fail mainly thanks to the lack of dedicated servers. I also wonder why I haven't found a server that switches map every so much rounds. I guess that feature isn't done yet AFAIK MoH has only 1 map per gametype at this moment xD Well, then switch gamemodes every 2 or something rounds... It can't be that hard.... It indeed shouldnt but i guess the hosters are only intrested in 1 particular gamemode xD Im kinda wondering whether its already there... It seems to have been made on the same engine as BFBC2 xD Besides different maps and more retarded weaponhandling it is BC2. Also the classes are EXTREMELY limited and unlocking goes VERY slow. I like BC2 100 times more.
nopol10 wrote on Mon, 21 June 2010 17:01 Completely agree. Also, the chat feature seems to be borked in the beta, so it feels like I'm playing with a bunch of bots. No FPS nowadays seems to do socialising and community building as good as Renegade. Funny. People are complaining about this in StarCraft 2's beta, also. What you don't realize is that betas aren't made for chatting. What features did Renegade have to promote socializing and community building, again?
Dover wrote on Wed, 23 June 2010 02:44 nopol10 wrote on Mon, 21 June 2010 17:01 Completely agree. Also, the chat feature seems to be borked in the beta, so it feels like I'm playing with a bunch of bots. No FPS nowadays seems to do socialising and community building as good as Renegade. Funny. People are complaining about this in StarCraft 2's beta, also. What you don't realize is that betas aren't made for chatting. What features did Renegade have to promote socializing and community building, again? It has usable chat. Which is more than you can say from other games.
EvilWhiteDragon wrote on Tue, 22 June 2010 17:46 Dover wrote on Wed, 23 June 2010 02:44 nopol10 wrote on Mon, 21 June 2010 17:01 Completely agree. Also, the chat feature seems to be borked in the beta, so it feels like I'm playing with a bunch of bots. No FPS nowadays seems to do socialising and community building as good as Renegade. Funny. People are complaining about this in StarCraft 2's beta, also. What you don't realize is that betas aren't made for chatting. What features did Renegade have to promote socializing and community building, again? It has usable chat. Which is more than you can say from other games. So does Counter-Strike. If that's the criteria we're evaluating, then Counter-Strike must have a fantastic sense of community and be a great place to socialize! Even more so, considering the playerbase is several dozen times larger than Renegade's.
Dover wrote on Tue, 22 June 2010 20:48 EvilWhiteDragon wrote on Tue, 22 June 2010 17:46 Dover wrote on Wed, 23 June 2010 02:44 nopol10 wrote on Mon, 21 June 2010 17:01 Completely agree. Also, the chat feature seems to be borked in the beta, so it feels like I'm playing with a bunch of bots. No FPS nowadays seems to do socialising and community building as good as Renegade. Funny. People are complaining about this in StarCraft 2's beta, also. What you don't realize is that betas aren't made for chatting. What features did Renegade have to promote socializing and community building, again? It has usable chat. Which is more than you can say from other games. So does Counter-Strike. If that's the criteria we're evaluating, then Counter-Strike must have a fantastic sense of community and be a great place to socialize! Even more so, considering the playerbase is several dozen times larger than Renegade's. I hope you're joking since CSS has created some of the largest gaming communities in the world.
bakerrrr wrote on Tue, 22 June 2010 18:25 Dover wrote on Tue, 22 June 2010 20:48 EvilWhiteDragon wrote on Tue, 22 June 2010 17:46 Dover wrote on Wed, 23 June 2010 02:44 nopol10 wrote on Mon, 21 June 2010 17:01 Completely agree. Also, the chat feature seems to be borked in the beta, so it feels like I'm playing with a bunch of bots. No FPS nowadays seems to do socialising and community building as good as Renegade. Funny. People are complaining about this in StarCraft 2's beta, also. What you don't realize is that betas aren't made for chatting. What features did Renegade have to promote socializing and community building, again? It has usable chat. Which is more than you can say from other games. So does Counter-Strike. If that's the criteria we're evaluating, then Counter-Strike must have a fantastic sense of community and be a great place to socialize! Even more so, considering the playerbase is several dozen times larger than Renegade's. I hope you're joking since CSS has created some of the largest gaming communities in the world. Are we evaluating size or quality? Let's keep our criteria consistent. nopol says "good" in reference to the Renegade community, but nobody in their right mind would argue this community is "large". CSS is certainly a "large" community, but there are very few places where I am more likely to be called a faggot and have my parentage brought into question for not clicking fast enough, so it wouldn't be fair to say it's a "good" community.
What I mean is that Renegade's relatively slow gameplay inadvertently encourages people to talk to others ingame and that is how many people got engaged with different communities. I'm fully aware that betas are meant to dig out problems in the game and the problem of chat screwing up for some reason after you type for the first time IS a problem. On the socialising bit I'm not referring to the MOH beta but the FPS genre in general now. How often do people talk to others in MW2 (I keep using this cos its the only other FPS I play...) apart from calling others "faggot tubers" or "hackers"? Gotta dash, now medical appointment. More points possible later.
It's simple- FPS's provide quick, simple, and easy entertainment. And it's fucking killing the gaming industry.
I remember back when games used to be about providing quick, simple, easy entertainment.
Quote stack EvilWhiteDragon wrote on Wed, 23 June 2010 01:36 Omar007 wrote on Tue, 22 June 2010 20:30 EvilWhiteDragon wrote on Tue, 22 June 2010 20:16 Omar007 wrote on Tue, 22 June 2010 16:24 EvilWhiteDragon wrote on Tue, 22 June 2010 14:40 nopol10 wrote on Tue, 22 June 2010 02:01 EvilWhiteDragon wrote on Tue, 22 June 2010 05:27 My experience so far: WASTE OF TIME... I should've played Renegade or Bad Company 2. Perhaps that if I would've had MW2 that would've been an alternative as well. Completely agree. Also, the chat feature seems to be borked in the beta, so it feels like I'm playing with a bunch of bots. No FPS nowadays seems to do socialising and community building as good as Renegade. I don't know about Battlefield because I don't play it but attempting to make any friends online in MW2 is a complete fail mainly thanks to the lack of dedicated servers. I also wonder why I haven't found a server that switches map every so much rounds. I guess that feature isn't done yet AFAIK MoH has only 1 map per gametype at this moment xD Well, then switch gamemodes every 2 or something rounds... It can't be that hard.... It indeed shouldnt but i guess the hosters are only intrested in 1 particular gamemode xD Im kinda wondering whether its already there... It seems to have been made on the same engine as BFBC2 xD Besides different maps and more retarded weaponhandling it is BC2. Also the classes are EXTREMELY limited and unlocking goes VERY slow. I like BC2 100 times more. Same. Though MoH is fun to play now and then for the close combat But seriously to make it sellable FIX THE DAMN HITBOXES!!!!!!! Heatshots while shooting at feet and no hits when headshotting is just wrong.... Also as you have BFBC2 you may add me : Omar007 Also @ quick, simple, entertainment: Supaplex
I know what makes Renegade good. The IRC outputs and such. Almost every decent player knows there is somekind of channel for his favorite server where he can see who's playing and chat with them. This is a fact that is often neglected with new games, and even with BC2 there are no serverbots that can connect to an IRC channel and spam iwht with useful information. It can only output to it's own program.
EvilWhiteDragon wrote on Wed, 23 June 2010 04:01 I know what makes Renegade good. The IRC outputs and such. Almost every decent player knows there is somekind of channel for his favorite server where he can see who's playing and chat with them. This is a fact that is often neglected with new games, and even with BC2 there are no serverbots that can connect to an IRC channel and spam iwht with useful information. It can only output to it's own program. Plenty of games have that functionality. I know I've seen it in Counter-Strike and Call Of Duty 1 and 2. The only thing that's different is that in Renegade, because there's a relatively smaller number of servers that are relatively close-knit, features like IRC outputs are spread much more quickly and thoroughly.
Dover wrote on Tue, 22 June 2010 22:29 I remember back when games used to be about providing quick, simple, easy entertainment. ...Except MW2 players consider MW2 to be a deep, innovative, and astounding game that is the best thing to have ever been made. But so goddamn many seriously think it's the best fucking thing ever. It's not. Also, I'm not against quick, simple, easy entertainment. But when it comes to FPS's, it's pretty fucking terrible. It just feeds off of the basic hormones of every teenaged guy. FPS's, to me, should be limited to horror stuff. It's a perspective, not a genre of HURF DURF I SHOOT U FIRST LOL I WIN multiplayer bullshit. Or, rather, it SHOULDN'T be that, but it seems to have become that.
GEORGE ZIMMER wrote on Wed, 23 June 2010 07:58 FPS's, to me, should be limited to horror stuff. It's a perspective, not a genre of HURF DURF I SHOOT U FIRST LOL I WIN multiplayer bullshit. Or, rather, it SHOULDN'T be that, but it seems to have become that. Spoken like a true non-FPS player.
GEORGE ZIMMER wrote on Wed, 23 June 2010 15:58 Also, I'm not against quick, simple, easy entertainment. But when it comes to FPS's, it's pretty fucking terrible. It just feeds off of the basic hormones of every teenaged guy. FPS's, to me, should be limited to horror stuff. It's a perspective, not a genre of HURF DURF I SHOOT U FIRST LOL I WIN multiplayer bullshit. Or, rather, it SHOULDN'T be that, but it seems to have become that. I can somewhat agree with you. Most games where you can just jump in and play as if you've played this game for a long time, are horrible and decline in value really fast. Games where it actually take skill have a longer replay value, but you can't just hop into a game and play it well. You look like an idiot to the other players and they have a higher chance of insulting you. The balance between these two is a key to a great game, and Renegade has a considerably good balance, but gives a disadvantage to the newcomer at this time.
Dover wrote on Wed, 23 June 2010 14:58 GEORGE ZIMMER wrote on Wed, 23 June 2010 07:58 FPS's, to me, should be limited to horror stuff. It's a perspective, not a genre of HURF DURF I SHOOT U FIRST LOL I WIN multiplayer bullshit. Or, rather, it SHOULDN'T be that, but it seems to have become that. Spoken like a true non-FPS player. Says the one who doesn't even play Renegade.
GEORGE ZIMMER wrote on Wed, 23 June 2010 18:05 Dover wrote on Wed, 23 June 2010 14:58 GEORGE ZIMMER wrote on Wed, 23 June 2010 07:58 FPS's, to me, should be limited to horror stuff. It's a perspective, not a genre of HURF DURF I SHOOT U FIRST LOL I WIN multiplayer bullshit. Or, rather, it SHOULDN'T be that, but it seems to have become that. Spoken like a true non-FPS player. Says the one who doesn't even play Renegade. bawl smack, oo
GEORGE ZIMMER wrote on Wed, 23 June 2010 16:05 Dover wrote on Wed, 23 June 2010 14:58 GEORGE ZIMMER wrote on Wed, 23 June 2010 07:58 FPS's, to me, should be limited to horror stuff. It's a perspective, not a genre of HURF DURF I SHOOT U FIRST LOL I WIN multiplayer bullshit. Or, rather, it SHOULDN'T be that, but it seems to have become that. Spoken like a true non-FPS player. Says the one who doesn't even play Renegade. Not anymore, no. There's only so much of the same a person can take before the game gets stale. There's a reason StarCraft maps are used competetively for about two or three seasons (1 year, ish) and then phased out. Anyway, how is me not playing Renegade relevant? Most of these forums don't play Renegade anymore, and while Renegade may be an FPS, an FPS is not necessarily Renegade.