Command and Conquer: Renegade Official Forums - RDF feed
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Command And Conquer Red Alert 3 Fun Or Stupid.
What Is Your Opinion To Game Command And Conquer Red Alert 3 It Has Some History To It But As Far As I Am Concerned It Fails In Comparison To The Original Red Alert Released By Westwood Studios The Company E.A. Games Sucks.
Re: Command And Conquer Red Alert 3 Fun Or Stupid.
It is a fun game, but RA1 and RA2 fail. ..never been a RA fan.. Tiberium FTW!
Looking from the gameplay clips, I think it will be fun but the movies are HORRIBLE with poor casting. Tasteless and has no magic from that of the RA2 movies.
pawkyfox wrote on Fri, 05 September 2008 18:21 Looking from the gameplay clips, I think it will be fun but the movies are HORRIBLE with poor casting. Tasteless and has no magic from that of the RA2 movies. WHAT!? The cast for the FMVs in RA3 is fucking awesome!
R315r4z0r wrote on Fri, 05 September 2008 16:32 It is a fun game, but RA1 and RA2 fail. You can die right this second.
pawkyfox wrote on Fri, 05 September 2008 17:21 Looking from the gameplay clips, I think it will be fun but the movies are HORRIBLE with poor casting. Tasteless and has no magic from that of the RA2 movies. The Marketing Strategy For The Game Red Alert 3 Was Sex Sells. But For The Original Red Alert It Was Simple Logic. You Can Compare From Just The Pictures I Think.
thrash300 wrote on Fri, 05 September 2008 18:50 The Marketing Strategy For The Game Red Alert 3 Was Sex Sells. Where do you get that from? That has to be the ugliest girl I've ever seen. She looks like a dude.
Seeing all this talk about RA3, I finally decided to install C&C3...am playing through the GDI missions lol, pretty cool units tbh!
i think ra3 will be cool u guys are so picky everything has to be same as classic i loved every cnc game ever made either way its a game an d its fun
thrash300 wrote on Fri, 05 September 2008 17:50 pawkyfox wrote on Fri, 05 September 2008 17:21 Looking from the gameplay clips, I think it will be fun but the movies are HORRIBLE with poor casting. Tasteless and has no magic from that of the RA2 movies. The Marketing Strategy For The Game Red Alert 3 Was Sex Sells. But For The Original Red Alert It Was Simple Logic. You Can Compare From Just The Pictures I Think. Sex Has Always Been A Theme In Movies & Games. It All Depends On How Far The Writers/Directors/Marketting Dudes Move That Theme To The Center. In Red Alert, There Was Stalin & Nadia Doing Something Together. LOL. But OfCourse, That Was Not Used To Sell The Game. But As Time Goes On, Movie/Game Makers Have Pushed The Theme Of Sex More To The Center Of Attention. However, I Do Agree With You That They Are Focusing Too Much On The Women...Especially In RA3. EDIT: It's Even Worse Now Due To Japanese Babes. I Am Looking Forward To RA3 ONLY To Play As Soviets...Nothing Else. Otherwise, The Game Seems Like A Lot Of Fantasy Units Clogged Together. I Do Hope They Make The Storyline Longer.
Are you in the Beta? Cause the game is very fun and playable. Japan and Allies FTW. I don't like Soviets.
R315r4z0r wrote on Fri, 05 September 2008 17:32 It is a fun game, but RA1 and RA2 fail. ..never been a RA fan.. Tiberium FTW! Of course, Tiberian Universe is the best! But seriously R3, how could you NOT like RA1 & RA2? WOW man lol! ---------- R315r4z0r wrote on Fri, 05 September 2008 21:42 Are you in the Beta? Cause the game is very fun and playable. Japan and Allies FTW. I don't like Soviets. No, I am not in the Beta but I completly understand the gameplay would be very nice as I mentioned in my first post in this thread.
I lost interest in Red Alert 1 during that first indoor mission. And RA2 failed when it diverted from the Tiberium universe.
He left out the I Think at the end! Someone else is using his account.
I am in the beta and... : ( I really don't like it at all... It's not fun for me in the least.
pawkyfox wrote on Fri, 05 September 2008 17:21 Looking from the gameplay clips, I think it will be fun but the movies are HORRIBLE with poor casting. Tasteless and has no magic from that of the RA2 movies. What magic? There's more talent in 'A Night in Paris' than there is on Red Alert 2's movies.
nikki6ixx wrote on Sat, 06 September 2008 14:33 pawkyfox wrote on Fri, 05 September 2008 17:21 Looking from the gameplay clips, I think it will be fun but the movies are HORRIBLE with poor casting. Tasteless and has no magic from that of the RA2 movies. What magic? There's more talent in 'A Night in Paris' than there is on Red Alert 2's movies. Was referring to Westwood's quality and execution of it's movies.
The movies in Westwood's games sucked too. Just because they pioneered FMVs into C&C, doesn't mean that they were good at it.. As but I'm not complaining about the quality. If you want my personal opinion on it, the FMVs that EA put into the recent C&C games are much better than the FMVs in the old C&Cs for the simple reason that technology to do such things is now available when it wasn't back then. I don't prefer any FMVs over others through the different games because as long as they get the point across (correctly) and don't screw up the mood of the story, it is perfectly fine. Who plays what part and how they look compared to how they act doesn't concern me unless it is obvious they are not in character or barely acting at all.
That's not what I meant. RA3 continues the storyline and has some of the same characters from RA2 like Tanya, Einstein and some others. What I am saying is that some actors brought in to fill the roles of these RA universe characters are not fulfilling. Maybe my perception will change as I play through the game but I am not liking the initial scenes I am seeing. FYI, I like C&C3 movies. EDIT: And lets not forget the crapload of female heroines they have brought in for each faction. Why should there be a Soviet heroine rather than some bear-like guy like Boris? Should they feminize everything?
pawkyfox wrote on Sat, 06 September 2008 16:08 And lets not forget the crapload of female heroines they have brought in for each faction. Why should there be a Soviet heroine rather than some bear-like guy like Boris? Should they feminize everything? One word: Cleavage.
Boris > Tasha
The RA series is not "true" C&C, only tiberium is.
pawkyfox wrote on Sat, 06 September 2008 17:08 That's not what I meant. RA3 continues the storyline and has some of the same characters from RA2 like Tanya, Einstein and some others. What I am saying is that some actors brought in to fill the roles of these RA universe characters are not fulfilling. Well the Red Alert universe revolves around the use of a Time machine. The only character that really remains consistent throughout the entire series is Einstein. Tanya isn't a specific person. She is just a special agent code-named Tanya. That's why it makes sense for her to be played by a different actor. Over all, I think the cast is excellent. And from what I saw in the FMV trailer, they are going to be very high quality videos.
R315r4z0r wrote on Fri, 05 September 2008 19:01 thrash300 wrote on Fri, 05 September 2008 18:50 The Marketing Strategy For The Game Red Alert 3 Was Sex Sells. Where do you get that from? That has to be the ugliest girl I've ever seen. She looks like a dude. She looks like George W Bush
madrackz wrote on Sat, 06 September 2008 19:35 R315r4z0r wrote on Fri, 05 September 2008 19:01 thrash300 wrote on Fri, 05 September 2008 18:50 The Marketing Strategy For The Game Red Alert 3 Was Sex Sells. Where do you get that from? That has to be the ugliest girl I've ever seen. She looks like a dude. She looks like George W Bush No, not really. Judging from your track record with world leader identification though, I can't blame you. You think everybody looks like George Bush.
u6795 wrote on Sat, 06 September 2008 23:12 madrackz wrote on Sat, 06 September 2008 19:35 R315r4z0r wrote on Fri, 05 September 2008 19:01 thrash300 wrote on Fri, 05 September 2008 18:50 The Marketing Strategy For The Game Red Alert 3 Was Sex Sells. Where do you get that from? That has to be the ugliest girl I've ever seen. She looks like a dude. She looks like George W Bush No, not really. Judging from your track record with world leader identification though, I can't blame you. You think everybody looks like George Bush. Thats his way of saying she looks stupid.
Muad Dib15 wrote on Sun, 07 September 2008 07:55 u6795 wrote on Sat, 06 September 2008 23:12 madrackz wrote on Sat, 06 September 2008 19:35 R315r4z0r wrote on Fri, 05 September 2008 19:01 thrash300 wrote on Fri, 05 September 2008 18:50 The Marketing Strategy For The Game Red Alert 3 Was Sex Sells. Where do you get that from? That has to be the ugliest girl I've ever seen. She looks like a dude. She looks like George W Bush No, not really. Judging from your track record with world leader identification though, I can't blame you. You think everybody looks like George Bush. Thats his way of saying she looks stupid. Looks like Barack Obama.
R315r4z0r wrote on Sun, 07 September 2008 10:49 Muad Dib15 wrote on Sun, 07 September 2008 07:55 u6795 wrote on Sat, 06 September 2008 23:12 madrackz wrote on Sat, 06 September 2008 19:35 R315r4z0r wrote on Fri, 05 September 2008 19:01 thrash300 wrote on Fri, 05 September 2008 18:50 The Marketing Strategy For The Game Red Alert 3 Was Sex Sells. Where do you get that from? That has to be the ugliest girl I've ever seen. She looks like a dude. She looks like George W Bush No, not really. Judging from your track record with world leader identification though, I can't blame you. You think everybody looks like George Bush. Thats his way of saying she looks stupid. Looks like Barack Obama. lol
Muad Dib15 wrote on Sun, 07 September 2008 14:41 R315r4z0r wrote on Sun, 07 September 2008 10:49 Muad Dib15 wrote on Sun, 07 September 2008 07:55 u6795 wrote on Sat, 06 September 2008 23:12 madrackz wrote on Sat, 06 September 2008 19:35 R315r4z0r wrote on Fri, 05 September 2008 19:01 thrash300 wrote on Fri, 05 September 2008 18:50 The Marketing Strategy For The Game Red Alert 3 Was Sex Sells. Where do you get that from? That has to be the ugliest girl I've ever seen. She looks like a dude. She looks like George W Bush No, not really. Judging from your track record with world leader identification though, I can't blame you. You think everybody looks like George Bush. Thats his way of saying she looks stupid. Looks like Barack Obama. lol Wanna Quote Wars?
R315r4z0r wrote on Fri, 05 September 2008 19:01 thrash300 wrote on Fri, 05 September 2008 18:50 The Marketing Strategy For The Game Red Alert 3 Was Sex Sells. Where do you get that from? That has to be the ugliest girl I've ever seen. She looks like a dude. Your Just Too Young To Understand I Think.
I'm older than you by about 6 months and 25 days...
to much bloody cheaters need some bot for this game with coop aceton
R315r4z0r wrote on Tue, 09 September 2008 01:49 I'm older than you by about 6 months and 25 days... Introducing The File Of Renegade Rambo But Havoc With The Long And Braided Hair That Looks Like Rambo But Its The Havoc Character. Maybe It Would Be Better That Way I Think.
Had to pick between the tits, and estrogen, eh?
nikki6ixx wrote on Tue, 09 September 2008 18:22 Had to pick between the tits, and estrogen, eh? The Character Now What Ever It Is Is Now Full Of Testostorone And Ready To Fight As Soon As Possible.
pawkyfox wrote on Wed, 10 September 2008 07:43 roflmao Does Anybody Still Play Command And Conquer Tiberian Sun Or Command And Conquer Tiberian Sun Fire Storm They Are Both Fun Games But Does Anybody Still Play Them Online I Remember Playing The Original Command And Conquer Tiberian Sun Not Too Long Ago About A Year Ago Stupid X.W.I.S. Prevents You From Saying Bad Words And It Also Checks For Serials For Fucks Sake Even Thought The Support Is Gone For The Game They Limit The Chat And Check The Serials They Don't Let You Use Bad Words In The Chat Server.
thrash300 wrote on Thu, 11 September 2008 01:43 pawkyfox wrote on Wed, 10 September 2008 07:43 roflmao Does Anybody Still Play Command And Conquer Tiberian Sun Or Command And Conquer Tiberian Sun Fire Storm They Are Both Fun Games But Does Anybody Still Play Them Online I Remember Playing The Original Command And Conquer Tiberian Sun Not Too Long Ago About A Year Ago Stupid X.W.I.S. Prevents You From Saying Bad Words And It Also Checks For Serials For Fucks Sake Even Thought The Support Is Gone For The Game They Limit The Chat And Check The Serials They Don't Let You Use Bad Words In The Chat Server. I Want To Play It Online. I Am Playing The Missions In Tiberian Sun Now. I Didn't Go Online Yet But I Will Soon.
Jesus pawkyfox. 600+ posts in 3 months Talk about classic case of a "forum troll"
RMCool13 wrote on Thu, 11 September 2008 16:24 Jesus pawkyfox. 600+ posts in 3 months Talk about classic case of a "forum troll" Troll is something entirely different, but I agree with you.. it's ridiculous.
I just found out a few days ago that this game will use SecuROM DRM. No way I'm buying RA3 with that bullshit on it.
u6795 wrote on Thu, 11 September 2008 16:50 RMCool13 wrote on Thu, 11 September 2008 16:24 Jesus pawkyfox. 600+ posts in 3 months Talk about classic case of a "forum troll" Troll is something entirely different, but I agree with you.. it's ridiculous. Check Out These Videos That If If You Want To. Video #1.,Video #2.Video #3.,Video #4.,Video #5., They Are The Command And Conquer Classics I Think.
Canadacdn wrote on Thu, 11 September 2008 18:24 I just found out a few days ago that this game will use SecuROM DRM. No way I'm buying RA3 with that bullshit on it. Link?
{SB}Lone0001 wrote on Thu, 11 September 2008 22:46 Canadacdn wrote on Thu, 11 September 2008 18:24 I just found out a few days ago that this game will use SecuROM DRM. No way I'm buying RA3 with that bullshit on it. Link? http://forums.ea.com/mboards/thread.jspa?threadID=430797&tstart=0 33 pages of outraged fans boycotting and bitching, etc. EA is totally fucking themselves over with something as retarded as DRM.
That settles it then- no RA3 for me. The game just isn't going to be good enough to justify the hassle of cracking SecuROM.
NukeIt15 wrote on Fri, 12 September 2008 16:15 That settles it then- no RA3 for me. The game just isn't going to be good enough to justify the hassle of cracking SecuROM. May come as a shok to you. Why not BUY it? I mean. ARMORED POLAR BEARS. Damm I need this game. Bear cavalry online. Welcome back commander.
When you buy it, it comes with that shit. Which fucks everything up.
I looked it up. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SecuROM#Controversies I also noticed this Quote: On September 7, 2008 EA released Spore using SecuROM. Public reaction has been swift and sharp, fueled by a grassroots campaign[6] to flood Spore's comments page on Amazon.com with one star reviews (the lowest possible rating). As of September 12th, 2008, there were 2,202 reviews (91% of all reviews) with a single star out of five rating. A vast majority of these comments cite SecuROM as the main reason for the low rating. Amazon Listing Ownt.
w0dka wrote on Fri, 12 September 2008 15:33 May come as a shok to you. Why not BUY it? I mean. ARMORED POLAR BEARS. Damm I need this game. Bear cavalry online. Welcome back commander. Doesn't look like you understand how this works. With the DRM EA's throwing on there, it may become necessary to crack your game. You may be thinking "Well, if you bought it, why would you have to crack it?" Well, it's not that simple. With the DRM there are all sorts of ways you can get screwed out of playing a game that you've legally bought. Say you've already used up your 5 installs, and EA refuses to grant you anymore authentications for whatever reason. You've just rented the game for $50. You can just forget about it or crack it so you can play the game. It's pretty much all the same thing for any sort of DRM, not just SecuROM. They're just punishing those who are following the law while those who pirate the software simply have a better product for the very attractive price of free.
cmatt42 wrote on Fri, 12 September 2008 16:56 w0dka wrote on Fri, 12 September 2008 15:33 May come as a shok to you. Why not BUY it? I mean. ARMORED POLAR BEARS. Damm I need this game. Bear cavalry online. Welcome back commander. Doesn't look like you understand how this works. With the DRM EA's throwing on there, it may become necessary to crack your game. You may be thinking "Well, if you bought it, why would you have to crack it?" Well, it's not that simple. With the DRM there are all sorts of ways you can get screwed out of playing a game that you've legally bought. Say you've already used up your 5 installs, and EA refuses to grant you anymore authentications for whatever reason. You've just rented the game for $50. You can just forget about it or crack it so you can play the game. It's pretty much all the same thing for any sort of DRM, not just SecuROM. They're just punishing those who are following the law while those who pirate the software simply have a better product for the very attractive price of free. Then Its A Deal Somebody Needs To Crack The Game And Host The Download Link It Can Work I Think.
w0dka wrote on Fri, 12 September 2008 16:33 NukeIt15 wrote on Fri, 12 September 2008 16:15 That settles it then- no RA3 for me. The game just isn't going to be good enough to justify the hassle of cracking SecuROM. May come as a shok to you. Why not BUY it? I mean. ARMORED POLAR BEARS. Damm I need this game. Bear cavalry online. Welcome back commander. That's funny- I can't recall having said anything about not buying games. Your mastery of the language is so very impressive, isn't it? Let me clarify: I do not pirate games, I buy them. I do, however, download and use cracks to bypass shitty DRM so that I'm not paying $60 for some half-assed phone-home security software to fuck up my $2500 computer. SecuROM is just about the most invasive DRM out there, so any game "protected" by it does not get installed on my computer until there is a proven-reliable crack to bypass it. RA3 will be a decent game at best, and I don't consider it worth the trouble (since it can sometimes take a fair bit of searching and fiddling around to un-DRM a game) when I could spend the same $60 on a great game with less obnoxious copy protection. Get the picture?
I have no interest in trying this game. RA2 was ass compared to the first, can't even imagine how bad this one will be.
Canadacdn wrote on Thu, 11 September 2008 15:24 I just found out a few days ago that this game will use SecuROM DRM. No way I'm buying RA3 with that bullshit on it. whats that>
It's some gay anti-piracy crap that has one major draw back: it only allows you to install the game like 2 or 3 times before the installer becomes unusable and you have to pay to install it more.
This is total crap. I have never pirated games but to allow only 5 installs? Total BS...no freaking way. I have re-installed Ren/other games so many times it scares me to know I can install/reinstall a $50 game only 5 times? It's just too draconian to put a installation limit. I guess I will have to find a way...heh I will...
R315r4z0r wrote on Fri, 12 September 2008 21:48 It's some gay anti-piracy crap that has one major draw back: it only allows you to install the game like 2 or 3 times before the installer becomes unusable and you have to pay to install it more. im sure someone will find a hack or loophole or something
just found out from the EA forums that the 5 install limit WILL NOT be used if you install/uninstall/reinstall the game all the while connected to the internet. just make sure your ethernet cable is plugged in to your comp...EA Nazis will track your game files as you install for first time/register/and during reinstall.. Once they see you reinstalled the same serial/key on the same comp, they will give back the install limit back. or something like that... but the this whole DRM looks a bit farstretched http://forums.ea.com/mboards/thread.jspa?threadID=430797&start=0&tstart= 0
Well gee, isn't that thoughtful of them. Nevermind that SecuROM doesn't fucking work. Anti-piracy software fails to prevent piracy and is therefore burdensome only to paying customers.
NukeIt15 wrote on Sat, 13 September 2008 12:40 Well gee, isn't that thoughtful of them. Nevermind that SecuROM doesn't fucking work. Anti-piracy software fails to prevent piracy and is therefore burdensome only to paying customers. Even If There Is A Crack Is The Game Even Worth Playing Because There Probably Will Be A Crack Soon But E.A. Games Already Screwed Up R.A. 2 What Makes You Think That R.A. 3 Will Be Any Better It Probably Is The Worst Out Of All Of Them.
I really couldn't care less about any DRM crap so long as it doesn't go wrong and not let me install at all. I think RA3 will be a brilliant game and, now I think of it, I should go and pre-order it from somewhere. I've also been playing Spore for a week with no problems, and that's an epically awesome game too. I hate it that people are giving the whole game bad review just because of the DRM.
thrash300 wrote on Sun, 14 September 2008 04:00 NukeIt15 wrote on Sat, 13 September 2008 12:40 Well gee, isn't that thoughtful of them. Nevermind that SecuROM doesn't fucking work. Anti-piracy software fails to prevent piracy and is therefore burdensome only to paying customers. Even If There Is A Crack Is The Game Even Worth Playing Because There Probably Will Be A Crack Soon But E.A. Games Already Screwed Up R.A. 2 What Makes You Think That R.A. 3 Will Be Any Better It Probably Is The Worst Out Of All Of Them. Are you fucking joking? EA didn't really screw up RA2, it was (in terms of gameplay) one of the best C&C's so far. Don't even get me started on the modability. I'm working on like 2 mods for it as we speak, and when exactly did this game come out? RA3 is shaping up to be an incredible game. I've played the beta a ton, it truly is probably the most fun experience of any C&C I've played. However, I have principles, and truly the DRM is a showstopper for me. Perhaps sometime in the future I might get over it, but for now it doesn't seem likely.
Keep in mind that your version of "fun" doesn't necessarily equate to anyone else's. I guarantee there will be at least as many people who think it suck as players who enjoy it. I may still try the demo, when it comes down the pipe, because I don't believe in writing off a game as shit before it comes out. I still have a number of questions about the game that I'd like answered- even though I have no intention of buying it. However, it looks like the same RTS formula that's become so dominant in the genre- lots of special units, lots of superweapons, lots of rushing. Lather, rinse, repeat. Not my idea of a good time.
NukeIt15 wrote on Sun, 14 September 2008 14:23 Keep in mind that your version of "fun" doesn't necessarily equate to anyone else's. I guarantee there will be at least as many people who think it suck as players who enjoy it. I may still try the demo, when it comes down the pipe, because I don't believe in writing off a game as shit before it comes out. I still have a number of questions about the game that I'd like answered- even though I have no intention of buying it. However, it looks like the same RTS formula that's become so dominant in the genre- lots of special units, lots of superweapons, lots of rushing. Lather, rinse, repeat. Not my idea of a good time. True enough, but lots of people can agree on certain fundamentals at least with RA2. It was a revolutionary game, to say the least. I see where you're coming from too with RA3, but I have to say you need to try it first. I had the same doubts you've said before I played it but playing it completely changed my opinion.
NukeIt15 wrote on Sun, 14 September 2008 13:23 Keep in mind that your version of "fun" doesn't necessarily equate to anyone else's. I guarantee there will be at least as many people who think it suck as players who enjoy it. I may still try the demo, when it comes down the pipe, because I don't believe in writing off a game as shit before it comes out. I still have a number of questions about the game that I'd like answered- even though I have no intention of buying it. However, it looks like the same RTS formula that's become so dominant in the genre- lots of special units, lots of superweapons, lots of rushing. Lather, rinse, repeat. Not my idea of a good time. Agreed. EA is notorious for grabbing popular and unique game series and turning them into clones that they release and re-release each year with a new name. Need for Speed series for example. But you gotta admit that the C&C games have great replay value...in other words, you never really get bored. Replay value is something I really look at when buying a game. But for any C&C game, of course, I buy it right away...thats a given. I like the skirmish options in C&C3 for example with the different types of AI. Lots of replay fun there. You can never really get bored...lots of features to play with. u6795 wrote on Sun, 14 September 2008 18:03 NukeIt15 wrote on Sun, 14 September 2008 14:23 Keep in mind that your version of "fun" doesn't necessarily equate to anyone else's. I guarantee there will be at least as many people who think it suck as players who enjoy it. I may still try the demo, when it comes down the pipe, because I don't believe in writing off a game as shit before it comes out. I still have a number of questions about the game that I'd like answered- even though I have no intention of buying it. However, it looks like the same RTS formula that's become so dominant in the genre- lots of special units, lots of superweapons, lots of rushing. Lather, rinse, repeat. Not my idea of a good time. True enough, but lots of people can agree on certain fundamentals at least with RA2. It was a revolutionary game, to say the least. I see where you're coming from too with RA3, but I have to say you need to try it first. I had the same doubts you've said before I played it but playing it completely changed my opinion. RA2 was not revolutionary man...RA2 was what TS was supposed to be. But yes, great game when it comes to playability.
R315r4z0r wrote on Fri, 05 September 2008 16:32 ..never been a RA fan.. Tiberium FTW!
Nice job bumping a month old topic, scrinoid. I'm really, really hearting this game. Multiplayer, apart from some interface/lobby issues, is brilliant. The FMV's are mainly awesome, the soundtrack is rawking, and fully co-op missions are one of the best ideas ever. Some flaws are present obviously, but while I'm still finding it fun to play they're negligible.
pawkyfox wrote on Sat, 13 September 2008 01:19 but the this whole DRM looks a bit farstretched http://forums.ea.com/mboards/thread.jspa?threadID=430797&start=0&tstart= 0 Quote: As you might imagine, I'm a lot less respectful of those people who take the position that they will illegally download a game simply because it has DRM. Wait, was that EA admitting people were going to pirate the software to get past the DRM which is supposedly made just so that people won't pirate the game?
in my opinion, they made ra3 better then 2. Face it, the game is good and well ballanced imo.
renalpha wrote on Wed, 19 November 2008 14:40 in my opinion, they made ra3 better then 2. Face it, the game is good and well ballanced imo. I think they're both equally awesome. RA3 is the more balanced of the two but RA2 definitely has a few things up on it- modability, etc.
Ra 3 is more balanced, thers no rhino spam that allies cant handle or else. Allies vs Soviets are almost perfectly balanced compared to underpowered Empire of the Riseing Cock..sun. Unit quotes are fun. e.g Conscrpit - Do they have television in there?