Command and Conquer: Renegade Official Forums - RDF feed
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
nooo accusing me of cheats lmfaoooooo, and leaving during a 1v1: http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/8060/mwrightjq5.png http://img254.imageshack.us/img254/2558/mwright2cl0.png http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/3/mwright3wr2.png http://img514.imageshack.us/img514/5393/mwright4yf0.png ^^And I have a 2-3min video but im too lazy to do anything with it. MWright, RENE GOD!!!1
Wrong section wtf? thought this was the hot topics place..mod move it there please.
Because being a dick on the internet to make your e-penis bigger means EVERYTHING. EVERYTHING.
Wow, so you won a 1v1 on Complex with Nod? How could you even loose except if ped nuke were to be on? Flamers own this map, especially when there's oinly one player to counter you, so u can just pick an entrance that he can't cover. You must be pretty amazing . Not saying that MrWright is any good at the game but u could at least have taken GDI if u wanted to "proove" something.
WOW MWRIGHT R VIKTORY LOL! Also, Gozy, the screenshots don't show any ftanks...
Dover wrote on Fri, 29 February 2008 08:48 WOW MWRIGHT R VIKTORY LOL! Also, Gozy, the screenshots don't show any ftanks... Are you blind..?
Yeah, let's win a 1v1 on complex and then brag about it like complex 1v1's aren't solely based on lucky spawns... I have no trouble believing mwright is horrible but this says nothing, play him on field.
OH SHI!!!! LETS LIEK 1v1 ON LIEK A SERVRE THAT HAS LIEK 16 KBPS!!!!!! Dumbass, I'll kick your ass even if I'm on that lagass server.
A low kbps on a 1v1 is totally normal. No action = no data to send = low kbps.
Goztow wrote on Fri, 29 February 2008 06:28 A low kbps on a 1v1 is totally normal. No action = no data to send = low kbps. They are playing player hosted server, so it's lag for the other guy. Unless they live close to each other.
okkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk ekt lmfaooo. after talking him into finally playing me, I told him to join a cw server, didnt pick the map, and I picked nod manual, assuming he would join the same side to pick a side. He joined as nod (prob only because he didnt notice manual teaming), and before I could even type out "side?" he switched to gdi so I assumed he wanted to play as them, so i played...tho obviously ekt knows this with their extensive cw expereince L!OL
Playing a 1v1 on Complex as Nod is easy, buy a Flamer tank and just burn shit.
What the fuck does EKT have to do with this? Even if you did win, you're acting as if you just climbed mount everest with no legs, arms, or torso. You could have simply posted that shit and left out the "LMFAOOOO EKT LOLZ UR SUCK!1" comments, but no, you had to douche it up even further.
trooprm02 wrote on Fri, 29 February 2008 07:57 okkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk ekt lmfaooo. after talking him into finally playing me, I told him to join a cw server, didnt pick the map, and I picked nod manual, assuming he would join the same side to pick a side. He joined as nod (prob only because he didnt notice manual teaming), and before I could even type out "side?" he switched to gdi so I assumed he wanted to play as them, so i played...tho obviously ekt knows this with their extensive cw expereince L!OL Do you seriously have down syndrome? I'm not even remotely associated with EKT anymore, retard. You really should think about seeing a psychologist.
nod doesn't own complex 1v1, it's not unfair at all tbh as far as the side goes.
watch sadukar/ekt try to argue that lol, and agianst someone whose played alot more cw's than even me, haha. Either way, I didnt waste my time on this for nothing, he started shit again, so as usual, I finished it.
Finish all the other 1vs1's you've been challenged to, and maybe I'll see you as less of a douche. Maybe.
NOBODY CARES ABOUT YOUR STUPID 1v1 MATCHES.
Canadacdn wrote on Fri, 29 February 2008 16:10 NOBODY CARES ABOUT YOUR STUPID 1v1 MATCHES. lol Canada i like your Answers and Avatar XD
Cabal8616 wrote on Fri, 29 February 2008 15:23 Finish all the other 1vs1's you've been challenged to, and maybe I'll see you as less of a douche. Maybe. wow..you are quite stupid, sir. @cdn, ok rp2 LMFAOooo,,,,,,
SHIT GUYS. THIS GUY DENIED ME THE OPPORTUNITY TO ENLARGE MY E-PENIS. TIME TO GO BITCH AND WHINE ABOUT IT ON A FORUM WHERE 90 % OF THE PEOPLE DON'T CARE. HEY, WHILE I'M AT IT, I SHOULD ADD MY UNIQUE DOUCHEY TWIST TO IT LIKE ALWAYS. LARGE CAPITAL LETTERS TO MAKE IT SEEM LIKE I'M SHOUTING IN YOUR HEAD. FUCK YEAH!!!!
trooprm02 wrote on Fri, 29 February 2008 15:21 watch sadukar/ekt try to argue that lol, and agianst someone whose played alot more cw's than even me, haha. Either way, I didnt waste my time on this for nothing, he started shit again, so as usual, I finished it. Yea...what happened to my 1v1 from last year?
u38729482, you must be cool in real life, lmfaooo. @ekt, you dont remeber? Goku told you and your entire clan not to lay me/TRPM, you thinking I wasted my time going to your irc server for nothing? And as usual, you kissed his ass harrrrrd, hence no game, +its a waste of time, I'd let my little brother playing against you and he'd still win L!OL.
trooprm02 @Goku, why you comming out of your hole now and not months ago when I originally asked? Either way, duh, I'd love to make you and your "renegade players" famous on youtube. If anything, 1v1 add me too buddies, im not gonna g33k it up and set a specific time+date if thats what your expecting lmfaooo. Yep, cuz having a specific time and date OBVIOUSLY is for geeks, and it's VERY orginized. Especially when I NEVER see you on. Also, yeah, I'd imagine he's pretty cool in real life. Can't say though, because unlike you, I don't really know him in real life. Because obviously, you know, seeing as how you know about his life and everything about him, obviously shows you must be his closest friend in real life.
trooprm02 wrote on Fri, 29 February 2008 20:24 u38729482, you must be cool in real life, lmfaooo. @ekt, you dont remeber? Goku told you and your entire clan not to lay me/TRPM, you thinking I wasted my time going to your irc server for nothing? And as usual, you kissed his ass harrrrrd, hence no game, +its a waste of time, I'd let my little brother playing against you and he'd still win L!OL. Fuck yeah I am, I'm so cool that I get on my computer every day thinking 'WHO CAN I FUCKING RAPE AT A 6 YEAR OLD GAME TODAY?!?"
Starbuzz wrote on Fri, 29 February 2008 21:42 2 pages of crap. Excuse me sir, there are 3 pages in this topic.
u6795 wrote on Fri, 29 February 2008 21:01 Starbuzz wrote on Fri, 29 February 2008 21:42 2 pages of crap. Excuse me sir, there are 3 pages in this topic. I see 2 pages.
Starbuzz wrote on Fri, 29 February 2008 22:07 u6795 wrote on Fri, 29 February 2008 21:01 Starbuzz wrote on Fri, 29 February 2008 21:42 2 pages of crap. Excuse me sir, there are 3 pages in this topic. I see 2 pages. Had posts per page set on 10, you get the joke though, right?
At times like this, I wish Blazer/Crimson would make the messages per page a fixed number, so everyone sees the same amount. It's also times like this I wish I had a vanilla coke.
u6795 wrote on Fri, 29 February 2008 21:08 Starbuzz wrote on Fri, 29 February 2008 22:07 u6795 wrote on Fri, 29 February 2008 21:01 Starbuzz wrote on Fri, 29 February 2008 21:42 2 pages of crap. Excuse me sir, there are 3 pages in this topic. I see 2 pages. Had posts per page set on 10, you get the joke though, right? yep
I want a pie and a Pepsi, and 1v1 from troop. But he is too scared I'll chop his E-Penis off.
I want sex, good food, a drink and lots o' money.
He denies this, but he during our little ''match'', he threw multiple C4 on my terminal and it wouldn't let me repair them. Also, for those of you who say ''MWright may not be any good but....''. Have you ever even played with me? No. Only Starbuzz, and maybe Cabal have played with me in game a few times. None of you know what I'm like, nor my ability level. I'm not a master, no, but I also have a life, and I can't devote it to a game 24/7. If anyone would like to play me on Jelly server or something, I'll be happy to take up the offer and most likely annihiliate you Anyhoo, if for some reason it was lag or something, and he honestly did beat me, then congrats troops, you won fair and square, but I honestly don't think you did. Please continue with the flaming of troop's ignorance.
uhh, no glitching c4's troop lol.... msn me later troop, we can get some more games, shame we only got 2 in last night -.-
Yeah, it's that time again. Toggle Spoiler
@cabal, im sorry I dont play rp2 24/7, its called life, try it some time? @u38947, ya because having a signature showing how many hours you play video games must make you super cool in real life! And the fugly pic you had of yourself on msn (dp), you must be dating a ppron star or something, L!OL @mwhomosexual, multiple c4's? Lol? so you changed your story from 1 c4 to "multiple"? @jason, glitch c4 n_P
trooprm02 wrote on Sat, 01 March 2008 17:55 @u38947, ya because having a signature showing how many hours you play video games must make you super cool in real life! And the fugly pic you had of yourself on msn (dp), you must be dating a ppron star or something, L!OL lol Once again, i'll remind you I've had that game for 3 years now. It's a good game. (obviously, if pricks like you take it this fucking seriously) Also, I'm sorry I don't have such a huge ego from playing RENEGADE 24/7. It's called a life. Try it some time. edit: I don't have MSN...? I also just realized the ultimate irony involved in you pointing out I must have no life in a topic you created because you got BUTTHURT on a video game.
trooprm02 wrote on Sat, 01 March 2008 16:55 @cabal, im sorry I dont play rp2 24/7, its called life, try it some time? Yes, you're right, at this very moment, I'm playing rp2. Infact, just earlier, while I was out hanging out with one of my friends, I was still playing rp2, then I realized I was dreaming and playing rp2, but also realized I WASN'T dreaming, because that would imply I'm sleeping, which would also imply I'm not on rp2. You figured me out .
nooooo playing rp2 lmfaoo.. u2983, you dont have msn? Funny...I guess someone else stole your exact display name, and said they were you a while hack...owned much? Lets keep this going, so far 2-3 people got shat on nppppp
trooprm02 wrote on Sat, 01 March 2008 23:38 nooooo playing rp2 lmfaoo.. u2983, you dont have msn? Funny...I guess someone else stole your exact display name, and said they were you a while hack...owned much? Lets keep this going, so far 2-3 people got shat on nppppp ...Lay off the drugs, man.
trooprm02 wrote on Sun, 02 March 2008 00:38 nooooo playing rp2 lmfaoo.. u2983, you dont have msn? Funny...I guess someone else stole your exact display name, and said they were you a while hack...owned much? Lets keep this going, so far 2-3 people got shat on nppppp I've never owned MSN in my life. If you're going to make up a story about me, at least do it in a way that doesn't reinforce my opinion that you are a druggie.
I think troop is secretly the forum Admin, because with all this crap, he should have been well banned by now >.>
Calx wrote on Sun, 02 March 2008 15:21 I think troop is secretly the forum Admin, because with all this crap, he should have been well banned by now >.> The heated discussions and debate - subforum is non moderated, as the sticky clearly says.
Goztow wrote on Sun, 02 March 2008 09:55 Calx wrote on Sun, 02 March 2008 15:21 I think troop is secretly the forum Admin, because with all this crap, he should have been well banned by now >.> The heated discussions and debate - subforum is non moderated, as the sticky clearly says. I suppose all the other forums he posts mindless crap in aren't moderated too then, amirite?
Canadacdn wrote on Sat, 01 March 2008 19:58 Yeah, it's that time again. Toggle Spoiler This is the only post in this entire thread worth anything. (and it's a pleco, FFS) Let's all ignore troop, he clearly has no idea about anything that goes on around him.
Calx wrote on Sun, 02 March 2008 17:55 Goztow wrote on Sun, 02 March 2008 09:55 Calx wrote on Sun, 02 March 2008 15:21 I think troop is secretly the forum Admin, because with all this crap, he should have been well banned by now >.> The heated discussions and debate - subforum is non moderated, as the sticky clearly says. I suppose all the other forums he posts mindless crap in aren't moderated too then, amirite? It's not much worse than yours...
oh, it was that rm39482 guy, not you, u398249208, but with very similair gay names, im not sure your different people.. lmfaoooo, its so funny watching this half breed homosexual trying to insult him when I have a 50mb folder of me raping the SHIT out of him, yet he claims "I can stand my own"...Yes, especially when you couldn't even beat me, "everyone knows you hack" lmfaooo dude, your hilarious, keep posting
trooprm02 wrote on Sun, 02 March 2008 13:00 oh, it was that rm39482 guy, not you, u398249208, but with very similair gay names, im not sure your different people.. lmfaoooo, its so funny watching this half breed homosexual trying to insult him when I have a 50mb folder of me raping the SHIT out of him, yet he claims "I can stand my own"...Yes, especially when you couldn't even beat me, "everyone knows you hack" lmfaooo dude, your hilarious, keep posting I clicked this topic expecting a stupid post, and I was not disappointed...
Troop is comparable to a small German boy wandering through the woods alone. Hes alive, but he has no idea whats going on around him.
Calx wrote on Sun, 02 March 2008 15:40 Troop is comparable to a small German boy wandering through the woods alone. Hes alive, but he has no idea whats going on around him. ........
trooprm02 wrote on Sun, 02 March 2008 17:28 Calx wrote on Sun, 02 March 2008 15:40 Troop is comparable to a small German boy wandering through the woods alone. Hes alive, but he has no idea whats going on around him. ........ LOL, DOTS, LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOO
LOL, PARODY OF TROOPS LAME INSULTS, LMFAOOOOO
1vs1 matches don't prove anything except the fact that if you are a Nod and use a Flame tank to win you must really suck otherwise. If you win any other way it doesn't prove anything except that you know how to destroy an empty base. Seriously, if you want to prove anything at all, than at least do a 2vs2 or more. Or if you REALLY wanna prove your skill do a 1 vs 2 or greater. But if you think 1 vs 1 is worthy of showing "skill" than that is pretty sad.
Not to mention, Nod on a map with no base defenses has so many 1 v. 1 advantages its not even funny. When we began the game, we were on the same team, and instantly moved to Nod, because he knew it would be easier to win that way. I'd love to see him play me as GDI on City with a Moderator so he couldn't CHEAT >.>......We'd see who would win. Anyhoo, back on topic: LMFAO LMFFFFAAAAOOOO!!! LMFAO!!111111!!!!1111
This entire topic is retarded. Don't post here anymore.
Even if you are Nod on a base-D map, you get owned by ob-walkers, or they just wait for you to leave your base and run out with a mobius + beacon
You can mine and usually the ped is off in such small games. By the time u do anything useful with your mobius and beacon, 3/4 of your base are gone through the flamer.
Like I said, if hes willing to play GDI on the same map, I'm happy to let him show me his skill.
Wow..the faggit still thinks I was cheating LOL. But yes, thats exactly why I posted SS's and have a video of the game, to make sure there was evidence to say that yes, infact I was cheating.. Also, glad to see im just soooooo ballin', everyone feels the need to copy my "lmfaoooo" thanks guys!
trooprm02 wrote on Mon, 03 March 2008 11:11 everyone feels the need to copy my "lmfaoooo" thanks guys! your lmfaooo ? who said we got it from you ?
jason761 wrote on Mon, 03 March 2008 14:15 Play Field 1v1. DON'T! for gods sake... He'll just start complaining about wall jumping when his ref goes down to a nuke like always...
You know, If you'd do a one man ref hop in 1on1 I'd complain to lol
Surth wrote on Mon, 03 March 2008 12:36 You know, If you'd do a one man ref hop in 1on1 I'd complain to lol Funny Surth. Back on topic... LMFAO!!!!
trooprm02 wrote on Mon, 03 March 2008 10:11 Wow..the faggit still thinks I was cheating LOL. But yes, thats exactly why I posted SS's and have a video of the game, to make sure there was evidence to say that yes, infact I was cheating.. Also, glad to see im just soooooo ballin', everyone feels the need to copy my "lmfaoooo" thanks guys! No dodging my 1v1 pl0x.
I just laugh when people talk about how 1v1s don't prove skill or how one side automatically wins on this map or that map when they've never played a 1v1 against anyone decent
Blazer wrote on Mon, 03 March 2008 01:15 Even if you are Nod on a base-D map, you get owned by ob-walkers ob walking's cheating Blazer wrote on Mon, 03 March 2008 01:15 or they just wait for you to leave your base and run out with a mobius + beacon there are just so many things wrong with this...
No, a typical excuse by a n00b would be "YOU CHEATED," I rarely see a n00b use that "excuse." Besides, this debate really isn't valid, since, logically, skill is based on perception, and opinion based in this topic, and you people are arguing over what skill is. Also, I haven't played Renegade in quite a long time now. I don't really care if I win or lose a game either, it's a game. Games are for fun.
Starbuzz wrote on Mon, 03 March 2008 17:17 Originally Blue wrote on Mon, 03 March 2008 16:48 No, a typical excuse by a n00b would be "YOU CHEATED," I rarely see a n00b use that "excuse." I disagree. A n00b who uses the "YOU CHEATED" is probably new to the game. A n00b who says "it's just a game" is one who has played the game, never improved, did not grasp the concepts, and is now just a headless snake. Wow? You're a idiot. I'm telling you people to get over it. To stop taking Renegade so seriously. Honestly! Then you started accusing me of sucking at the game, and I don't fucking care? Do you think I'd care if I'd say "It's a game"? No. Stop being a dork, and think about something other than renegade.
I'm in it for the community... I think the people are nice.
Starbuzz wrote on Mon, 03 March 2008 16:09 Also, 1v1 prove your ability to think and act fast and your ability to exploit Renegade's logic to your advantage. Not to mention the other skills needed like pistol skills. I don't think so. 1 vs 1 AOW matches prove NOTHING. All it is is a race to see who can destroy an empty base faster. There is no skill involved at all. There are many different ways a 1v1 AOW match can play out: 1. Both players leave their bases as fast as they can, avoiding one another. They then commence to destroy each other's undefended base. The person who can destroy it faster is victorious. 2. 1 player will await the other's quick rush and counter them, and then destroy the attacker's base while they have barely enough money to fight back (depending on the scenario) 3. Both players await the other's quick rush and the game turns into a mine-your-base fest with no attack action until after about 15-20 min. 4. Lets not forget this one that claims over all. One player clearly gains the advantage of a unit that the defender needs the support of another unit to destroy. (I.E. Flame tank). This one makes 1 vs 1s highly unfair and the "winner" a moron that thinks winning a video game proves that they are Jesus or something. (Also note that this scenario would only happen on given maps. For example if Nod tried to use a Flame tank on City flying, than it would be a whole other story.)
Once again, this topic is full of AIDs and should be locked.
R315r4z0r wrote on Mon, 03 March 2008 21:32 1 vs 1 AOW matches prove NOTHING. All it is is a race to see who can destroy an empty base faster. There is no skill involved at all. There are many different ways a 1v1 AOW match can play out: 1. Both players leave their bases as fast as they can, avoiding one another. They then commence to destroy each other's undefended base. The person who can destroy it faster is victorious. 2. 1 player will await the other's quick rush and counter them, and then destroy the attacker's base while they have barely enough money to fight back (depending on the scenario) 3. Both players await the other's quick rush and the game turns into a mine-your-base fest with no attack action until after about 15-20 min. 4. Lets not forget this one that claims over all. One player clearly gains the advantage of a unit that the defender needs the support of another unit to destroy. (I.E. Flame tank). This one makes 1 vs 1s highly unfair and the "winner" a moron that thinks winning a video game proves that they are Jesus or something. (Also note that this scenario would only happen on given maps. For example if Nod tried to use a Flame tank on City flying, than it would be a whole other story.) lol, if you don't know what you're talking about then just don't
Calx wrote on Sat, 01 March 2008 05:46 He denies this, but he during our little ''match'', he threw multiple C4 on my terminal and it wouldn't let me repair them. Also, for those of you who say ''MWright may not be any good but....''. Have you ever even played with me? No. Only Starbuzz, and maybe Cabal have played with me in game a few times. None of you know what I'm like, nor my ability level. I'm not a master, no, but I also have a life, and I can't devote it to a game 24/7. If anyone would like to play me on Jelly server or something, I'll be happy to take up the offer and most likely annihiliate you Anyhoo, if for some reason it was lag or something, and he honestly did beat me, then congrats troops, you won fair and square, but I honestly don't think you did. Please continue with the flaming of troop's ignorance. It's kind of obvious you suck, Mwright. Far from being a "master" (C4Smoke lol), I would guess from your posts here that you've never played the game and just briefly thumbed through the manual.
Dover wrote on Tue, 04 March 2008 02:39 Calx wrote on Sat, 01 March 2008 05:46 He denies this, but he during our little ''match'', he threw multiple C4 on my terminal and it wouldn't let me repair them. Also, for those of you who say ''MWright may not be any good but....''. Have you ever even played with me? No. Only Starbuzz, and maybe Cabal have played with me in game a few times. None of you know what I'm like, nor my ability level. I'm not a master, no, but I also have a life, and I can't devote it to a game 24/7. If anyone would like to play me on Jelly server or something, I'll be happy to take up the offer and most likely annihiliate you Anyhoo, if for some reason it was lag or something, and he honestly did beat me, then congrats troops, you won fair and square, but I honestly don't think you did. Please continue with the flaming of troop's ignorance. It's kind of obvious you suck, Mwright. Far from being a "master" (C4Smoke lol), I would guess from your posts here that you've never played the game and just briefly thumbed through the manual. I repeat, until you've played me, please reserve your assanine judgement.
Spoony wrote on Tue, 04 March 2008 02:47 lol, if you don't know what you're talking about then just don't lol, if you can make sense of this, than please do.
Grab some popcorn, and a soda everyone; I think we're in for a ten-pager.
R315r4z0r wrote on Tue, 04 March 2008 13:52 Spoony wrote on Tue, 04 March 2008 02:47 lol, if you don't know what you're talking about then just don't lol, if you can make sense of this, than please do. How many 1v1s have you played against good players, and how many of them have you won? If the answer to the first question is "a lot" and the answer the second question is "at least half" then you are qualified to say whether 1v1s take skill or not. If not, you aren't.
Why is it that Starbuzz has now turned into an incredibly ignorant (and not to mention arrogent) asshat? It's fairly annoying. Well, assuming he's not just pretending to be ignorant and whatnot. Anyways, 1vs1's DON'T prove anything. Renegade is a game about TEAMPLAY, atleast the AOW part. Now, a match in say, Duel Arena or something (Using normal infantry of course) and setting up proper 1vs1 infantry duels to test who has more "skill" in aiming is a good idea. Same with a vehicle duel and such in a normal map, assuming you don't go killing eachothers base and whatnot. But Renegade is based around teamplay, so saying that a 1vs1 proves everything shows you're an incredibly ignorant cock, and don't deserve to play this game anymore. Also, saying MWright hasn't played Renegade is another pretty stupid statement to make. He's shown screenshots of him actually being ingame, and while I can't say he's 100% skilled as I've never played him, saying he's the worst player ever is just another ignorant statement.
Cabal8616 wrote on Tue, 04 March 2008 14:21 Why is it that Starbuzz has now turned into an incredibly ignorant (and not to mention arrogent) asshat? It's fairly annoying. Well, assuming he's not just pretending to be ignorant and whatnot. haha I was only pretending ego-post deleted
Cabal8616 wrote on Tue, 04 March 2008 14:21 Anyways, 1vs1's DON'T prove anything. Of course they do. If they don't, somebody's going to have to explain the fact there are a handful of players who consistently win them. Cabal8616 wrote on Tue, 04 March 2008 14:21 Renegade is a game about TEAMPLAY, atleast the AOW part. Yes, indeed. That demonstrates 1v1s don't prove everything. That DOESN'T demonstrate 1v1s don't prove anything. There's an important difference. Cabal8616 wrote on Tue, 04 March 2008 14:21 Now, a match in say, Duel Arena or something (Using normal infantry of course) and setting up proper 1vs1 infantry duels to test who has more "skill" in aiming is a good idea. Easy tiger, you're defeating your own arguments here. First you say 1v1s don't prove anything because Renegade is a team game. Then you say it'd be better if it was just infantry, without tanks or basekill? Do you see the colossal flaw here? First you say the game is invalid by removing the teamplay aspect, then you say it's MORE valid by removing most of the units and strategies? What the fuck? Cabal8616 wrote on Tue, 04 March 2008 14:21 But Renegade is based around teamplay, so saying that a 1vs1 proves everything shows you're an incredibly ignorant cock, and don't deserve to play this game anymore. I've italicised the important part. It's important because it's a straw-man argument. Nobody said it did. You just made it up. Finally, I'll repeat something very important. Spoony wrote How many 1v1s have you played against good players, and how many of them have you won? If the answer to the first question is "a lot" and the answer the second question is "at least half" then you are qualified to say whether 1v1s take skill or not. If not, you aren't.
Starbuzz wrote on Tue, 04 March 2008 14:25 Cabal8616 wrote on Tue, 04 March 2008 14:21 Why is it that Starbuzz has now turned into an incredibly ignorant (and not to mention arrogent) asshat? It's fairly annoying. Well, assuming he's not just pretending to be ignorant and whatnot. No SBH sniper plx lmfaooo Funny how Public players who never played outside of their cozy warm loving team environment bitch about those who have the balls to challenge themselves further. What the fuck has got into you?
Spoony wrote on Tue, 04 March 2008 15:40 Of course they do. If they don't, somebody's going to have to explain the fact there are a handful of players who consistently win them. Winning a 1v1 AOW just proves you can win a 1v1. Which, as I said, in itself, doesn't matter for shit in like, any other circumstance. Spoony Yes, indeed. That demonstrates 1v1s don't prove everything. That DOESN'T demonstrate 1v1s don't prove anything. There's an important difference. I suppose so. It just demonstrates you can win a 1v1, and be able to exploit things that are unpractical in pretty much any other circumstance. Spoony Easy tiger, you're defeating your own arguments here. First you say 1v1s don't prove anything because Renegade is a team game. Then you say it'd be better if it was just infantry, without tanks or basekill? Do you see the colossal flaw here? First you say the game is invalid by removing the teamplay aspect, then you say it's MORE valid by removing most of the units and strategies? What the fuck? I obviously meant that a 1v1 in an AOW is what doesn't prove everything/anything (Whatever your preferred wording may be). But, an infantry only battle strips away the more "teamplay" kind of thing to it (Although teamplay is always handy), making it ideal for 1v1's. Winning in that can prove you're better with infantry vs infantry then. Spoony I've italicised the important part. It's important because it's a straw-man argument. Nobody said it did. You just made it up. I suppose you're right, but my point remains that it doesn't prove much atall other than that you can win the 1v1 in itself. That's like saying "Haha, I can run over the elderly!". Good for you, it doesn't matter for shit. Spoony Finally, I'll repeat something very important. Spoony wrote How many 1v1s have you played against good players, and how many of them have you won? If the answer to the first question is "a lot" and the answer the second question is "at least half" then you are qualified to say whether 1v1s take skill or not. If not, you aren't. I've played more 1v1's in more specific settings than "run to the enemy's base and see who can kill their base faster". Mostly infantry vs infantry. And yes, I win more than half of them, though I'm sure you're referring to 1vs1's in AOW's, so I suppose that's irrelevent.
Cabal8616 wrote on Tue, 04 March 2008 15:35 Winning a 1v1 AOW just proves you can win a 1v1. Which, as I said, in itself, doesn't matter for shit in like, any other circumstance. you may as well say "winning a team game just proves you can win a team game". Cabal8616 wrote on Tue, 04 March 2008 15:35 I obviously meant that a 1v1 in an AOW is what doesn't prove everything/anything (Whatever your preferred wording may be). What the fuck do you mean by "whatever your preferred wording"? If you are too thick to tell the difference between saying "1v1s don't prove anything" and "1v1s don't prove everything", just stop posting. Cabal8616 wrote on Tue, 04 March 2008 15:35 But, an infantry only battle strips away the more "teamplay" kind of thing to it (Although teamplay is always handy), making it ideal for 1v1's. Winning in that can prove you're better with infantry vs infantry then. this is just nonsense... Cabal8616 wrote on Tue, 04 March 2008 15:35 but my point remains that it doesn't prove much atall other than that you can win the 1v1 in itself. That's like saying "Haha, I can run over the elderly!". Good for you, it doesn't matter for shit. it matters because it demonstrates you don't need to rely on your teammates, you have pistol/tank/flying skills, quick thinking, the ability to capitalise on an advantage or overturn a disadvantage... but since you've probably never beaten anyone decent in a 1v1, I don't expect you to know these things. Cabal8616 wrote on Tue, 04 March 2008 15:35 I've played more 1v1's in more specific settings than "run to the enemy's base and see who can kill their base faster". Mostly infantry vs infantry. And yes, I win more than half of them, though I'm sure you're referring to 1vs1's in AOW's, so I suppose that's irrelevent. So indeed, you've never played a proper 1v1 and as such, are completely unqualified to act like you have the faintest idea what you're talking about, as if that wasn't already obvious.
Spoony wrote on Tue, 04 March 2008 15:17 R315r4z0r wrote on Tue, 04 March 2008 13:52 Spoony wrote on Tue, 04 March 2008 02:47 lol, if you don't know what you're talking about then just don't lol, if you can make sense of this, than please do. How many 1v1s have you played against good players, and how many of them have you won? I haven't played "A lot" but I have played many. And define what you mean by "good player." And, from memory, I have only lost like... 1/5th of them... I could be wrong. I'm telling you, each 1vs1 game I play all I do is avoid my opponent with a strong vehicle, attack his base, plant C4 on a building, use a tank to blow up another building, and possibly Ion if the credit amount is over 1000 at game start. The only reason why I win so many of them is because I can blow up an empty base pretty quickly if left alone... I do remember 1 game that I lost, but it wasn't a 1 vs 1, it was a 1 vs 2 (I was the 1). The game started out as a 1vs1, but we "agreed" not to fight until more people came. After about 5 min the agreement was off and we started attacking each other... but being that it was on City Flying, me being on Nod, I couldn't destroy his base as easily as I would liked. (I refuse to use the Flame Tank). Anyway, the game went on, and I was winning, then someone joined on his team. Still the game went on and I still was winning... I even held back duel APC rushes. (These guys sucked something aweful). Now about 10 min into the game, my apache got stuck. I said in public chat that it got stuck, and he said he would come to destroy it. At that time my mom told me to go put the garbage out... and by the time I came back, no more than 30 seconds later, I was still in my apache and all but the Hand was destroyed. I lost that game. & @ star, please explain how "pistol skills" come into play. If you are playing a 1vs1, at least the kind you guys are describing, you at no point should have to use a pistol. Like I said, and what Cabal said, a 1vs1 wont prove much in any areas that one might find "skillful." Unless you are playing in a death match or possibly an infantry only map. If you want to prove skill in this teamwork-based game, the only good way to do that is to go up against a team alone! 1vs2, 1vs3, 1vs4.... or proportion it.. 2vs6, 4vs16. (Oh man, I have played hundreds upon hundreds of those 4vs games)