Command and Conquer: Renegade Official Forums - RDF feed
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
I've noticed some WiseAssers over this forum. A WiseAsser is a person who thinks he or she Thinks/Wants/Tries or Perhaps is (Under certain point of views) To be better than others, braggers would be under the category. Perhaps wants to be looked up to under certain conditions. i have noticed these people will do it use perfect grammer to try to look smarter than they really are, they will put Periods at the end of things that are not even sentences. for example "Ok." Attempting to gain respect from people(Not persons) Unknown, than gaoled to be looked up to in the community. These people are more likely to try to make someone else look stupid, perhaps because they are a threat to them in a way or other unknown reasons. And more oftenly not very considerate. These people will also more oftenly avoid people they feel are not very Safisticated. They take there Reputation very seriously. These people have a greater understanding of the "Outgoing world" A Respectful is a person who is more relaxed when posting/talking, they want to be themselves, not anything else. These people more commonly respect others and are not very worried about there reputation. These people do not have as much Ambition. These people are less likely to try to make someone else look stupid, for unknown reasons, however sometimes might. These people are also more likely to admit to things they are ashamed of. They are oftenly more Considerate. I have noticed these people will not take too much credit at once, and if they are and notice someone else Deserving is not, they will lend a hand to them, not at all times though. These people have a greater understanding of the "Outgoing world" A Left is a person who thinks more about fitting in with others, and does not like the feeling of not fitting in, however they oftenly have a hard time fitting in. I have noticed these people are sensitive to certain things said by others, these people usually respect others and very oftenly look up to others in hope to be more like them, in some cases. They oftenly take their reputation more seriously. These people have a lower understanding of the "Outgoing World" Can be Suicidal. Different intelligent levels were not included here. Well, which of these do each of you think you are, or feel closest to. If you insist on Bashing, you are most likely an AssWiser. Depending on how you bash, but in most cases you would than fit under AssWiser, thanks
Darker wrote on Wed, 09 August 2006 23:55 I've noticed some WiseAssers over this forum. A WiseAsser is a person who thinks he or she thinks/wants/tries or perhaps is (under certain point of views) to be better than others, braggers would be under the category. Perhaps wants to be looked up to under certain conditions. I have noticed these people will do it use perfect grammer to try to look smarter than they really are, they will put periods at the end of things that are not even sentences. For example "Ok." Attempting to gain respect from people(not persons) unknown, than gaoled to be looked up to in the community. These people will also more oftenly avoid people they feel are not very sophisticated. They take their reputation very seriously. These people have a greater understanding of the "outgoing world"zOMG Wha0r is yuor Periud???!!?!? Don't make me post my possessive picture again. I also Have no Idea Why you keep Capitalising the First Letter In random Words. I suppose I'm a "WiseAsser". Maybe you could help me on my path to becoming a better person? After all, I am such an awful person.
I am aware that my grammer was not the best, that was because it was a big paragraph, and i am not worried much about grammer, For i do not take my rep. To seriously. Bad grammer does not mean you are stupid. But thanks anyways . And yes my Avator is sarcastic Back tah topic though
I don't think people can define themselves... They'd have to be defined by others.
Darker wrote on Thu, 10 August 2006 00:20 I am aware that my grammer was not the best, that was because it was a big paragraph, and i am not worried much about grammer, For i do not take my rep. To seriously. Bad grammer does not mean you are stupid. But thanks anyways . And yes my Avator is sarcastic Back tah topic though I'm resisting the temptation to correct here. I don't give a rat's ass what my "reputation" is on this forum. I'll never get to know 99% of the people on here well anyway. Oh, and I never said bad grammar makes you stupid. Having bad grammar means you have bad grammar, that's it. It just really gets to me that 95% of the English speaking population don't know the difference between "your"/"you're" and "there"/"their"/"they're", even though it's such a simplistic concept and so easy to grasp.
I never said that you think people are stupid if they have Bad grammer, i was just pointing that out. Alot of people get Their "Theres" mixed up, and comma's. Actually, I probably just did. Everyone has small things that bother them, it does not make you an asswiser. Infact, you are not much of an Asswiser. Another thing that makes you one is not taking the time to understand and consider someones point, or message etc...not that you would have done that. Quote: I don't think people can define themselves... They'd have to be defined by others. In alot of cases thats true. In my opinion, you are a more Considerate person
While having poor grammar doesn't make you stupid, it sure as shit doesn't make you look smart. On a bit of a tangent: Clearly you can see us spelling "grammar" correctly yet you continue to spell it wrong. Why is this? It's the same number of characters, so you aren't doing it to save time. Perhaps you have a learning disability? I'm not trying to be mean; my brother is dyslexic. This sort of thing geniunely interests me.
Perhaps he just doesn't know how to spell it?
Quote: Clearly you can see us spelling "grammar" correctly yet you continue to spell it wrong. Why is this? Actually no, because i do not look that closely at everything to notice that an E is supposed to be an A. I am not a perfectionist. Or an Asswiser. Thats true it does not make you look smart if you have poor grammar, but than again, if you do not have perfect grammar, it does not mean you have poor grammar. I consider my grammar OK. I mean take a look at Moe/Sensitive grammar, thats a good example of "poor grammar" Lets get off the grammar topic though, i do not think it is a very important thing to discuss. And it has nothing to do with the topic. And i corrected my spelling mistake and will keep it in mind. And pointing out things Ive done wrong or something else rather than focusing on the topic, is the ways of an Asswiser.
Dave Mason wrote on Wed, 09 August 2006 20:16 Perhaps he just doesn't know how to spell it? You're using AOL. You really don't have much room to talk, at the moment. I just think people don't take the time to notice the spelling of others. They just read the words rather than paying attention to how they're spelled. I don't know if it's necessarily done purposely, but it sure is annoying when you spell something correctly, someone repeats that word, and then they spell it incorrectly. I guess it's just one of those quirks in people. Learning from your peers doesn't really seem to hit home with many people.
I guess that peoples' brains read very differently because I would definitely notice something like that. Whatever. Does anyone else think this guy probably is Moee?
Everyones different mrpirate, some people read quicker and do not look closely at smaller things like that. But don't stress about it. Quote: These people are more likely to try to make someone else look stupid, perhaps because they are a threat to them in a way or other unknown reasons. And more oftenly not very considerate Alot of this activity is coming from you, MrPirate. You know I'm not the Moee character, yet you have Implied that you think I might be him. Not to mention, you will not tell us what you think you are closest to. Afraid to admit is also a way of the Asswiser.
I don't like to label myself. I think you're Moee because you brought up Moee unprovoked and because you say "asswiser," which isn't something I've ever heard before in my entire life except coming from Moee.
Well he's not from Vianet...lmao I'm a respectful, no?
Then you must be the bragger darker, because your signature says "I'm better than you."
Quote: And yes my Avator is sarcastic I said that in my earlier post Now see the difference here, I did not lash out on Sniper for not noticing that i had said that earlier. That makes me considerate. Because everyone makes mistakes, and not everyone reads every little thing before posting. You could call these people stupid for it, but common guys. The people that make these mistakes and for that matter any mistake, are all of us. Affraid not, and yes kamuix, I made up the terms
Ever since i joined these forums, a good 3-4 months ago, i have tried to be punctual in my posts. I am usually very punctual and formal when i type posts that require formality, however, when i am talking in IRC or to contacts on MSN etc etc i tend to be slang but will use correct grammar (apostraphies (< spelling?) in correct places to determain what i'm saying, commas to influence pauses in text etc etc). If you met me i would seem very formal for my age. With this i have been classed as being a "freak" by other students because i don't talk like they do. Some actually take the time to listen to what i say and take it all in, but still fail to see why i have this. For those who don't generally know, yes i do have a learning dissability, yes i was diagnosed with it last year, yes i do wish to know more about it and yes, it does affect the way i think about things. I have been playing Renegade for just over a year now, and have learnt alot since. I have joined a mod team to turn Renegade into Red Alert 2 (known as Apocalypse Rising) and have learnt alot from them. I have respect that i deserve from other team members and i wish to gain respect here. Class me as you wish, aslong as you understand what i'm going through and how hard it is for someone like me to get respect around here.
j_ball430 wrote on Thu, 10 August 2006 01:21 Dave Mason wrote on Wed, 09 August 2006 20:16 Perhaps he just doesn't know how to spell it? You're using AOL. You really don't have much room to talk, at the moment. Oooooh, that's harsh! Yes, AOL are a totally useless and incompetent shower of utter bastards but I don't pay the Internet bill. So.... meh...
Hard to gain respect? Merovingian, just saying that will have gotten you tons of respect, you have only been here that long and were already have tons of respect and was nominated for Moderator. Why do you insist on pretending you don't get respect. And another thing, it depends on how you go about getting respect, and what you do with the respect you get. Are you trying to look better than everyone else...no AssWisers Way Are you being Nice and helpful to the community...yes Respectfuls Way Do you think only Inward...No AssWisers Way Do you try to make others look stupid...No AssWisers Way Do you quote "Ok." A something without thats not a sentence with a period, no! You are a Respectful! Not an Asswiser
It's a public forum for a computer game! Who cares if a bunch of spotty 13 year old dullards "respect" them?
Darker wrote on Wed, 09 August 2006 20:34 Quote: These people are more likely to try to make someone else look stupid, perhaps because they are a threat to them in a way or other unknown reasons. And more oftenly not very considerate I hate that. It's so incredibly stupid. "They're just saying that because they feel threatened," or maybe they're saying it because it's true, but it's a way to keep the idiot's self-esteem high enough to where they don't end up swinging from their ceiling fan with their belt around their neck.
Dave Mason It's a public forum for a computer game! Who cares if a bunch of spotty 13 year old dullards "respect" them? Me, since i have no social respect what-so-ever. I never leave the house i have such bad respect. And their not necciserily spotty 13 year olds. I'm 17 myself but still alone. No freinds, no relationships, i have a family yes, but i hate them because they don't take me for who i am, they take me for my knowlage. A person is a person, with a mind to make up. Making it up is the hard part. Making others feel wanted is a hard part too.
Dave Mason wrote on Wed, 09 August 2006 21:22 It's a public forum for a computer game! Who cares if a bunch of spotty 13 year old dullards "respect" them? There are alot of people older than 13 that respect other people here, actually much older. But its pretty clear that people do care. I dont see much of a reason not to. I happen to know that you won't, which is not a bad thing. j_ball430 wrote on Wed, 09 August 2006 20:23 Darker wrote on Wed, 09 August 2006 20:34 Quote: These people are more likely to try to make someone else look stupid, perhaps because they are a threat to them in a way or other unknown reasons. And more oftenly not very considerate I hate that. It's so incredibly stupid. "They're just saying that because they feel threatened," or maybe they're saying it because it's true, but it's a way to keep the idiot's self-esteem high enough to where they don't end up swinging from their ceiling fan with their belt around their neck. Not really, and i did not say "They're just saying that because they feel threatened" I just sayed that could be one of the reasons. And some people are like that, not saying you are, i can see you are not.
Darker wrote on Wed, 09 August 2006 21:31 Not really, and i did not say "They're just saying that because they feel threatened" I just sayed that could be one of the reasons. And some people are like that, not saying you are, i can see you are not. I'm just saying, it's an overused excuse for people to use to help with self-esteem. I mean, it's an easy way out. "Oh, you're just jealous of/threatened by me." It's a scapegoat for them than to actually face the facts that maybe they aren't as important than they thought.
Merovingian wrote on Thu, 10 August 2006 02:30 Dave Mason It's a public forum for a computer game! Who cares if a bunch of spotty 13 year old dullards "respect" them? Me, since i have no social respect what-so-ever. I never leave the house i have such bad respect. And their not necciserily spotty 13 year olds. I'm 17 myself but still alone. No freinds, no relationships, i have a family yes, but i hate them because they don't take me for who i am, they take me for my knowlage. A person is a person, with a mind to make up. Making it up is the hard part. Making others feel wanted is a hard part too. I'm sorry to hear that, I'm sure you're a nice person. Maybe you could try meeting new people at college and/or work. Certainly worked for me. I only got on well with a handful of people from my school. They were mostly egotistical morons. When I got to college I picked a course that suited my interests and personality (music) and got to meet and befriend quite a few people who I had a lot in common with.
You forgot to add the people who try to catagorize other people.
Darker wrote on Wed, 09 August 2006 20:19 Hard to gain respect? Merovingian, just saying that will have gotten you tons of respect, you have only been here that long and were already have tons of respect and was nominated for Moderator. Why do you insist on pretending you don't get respect. And another thing, it depends on how you go about getting respect, and what you do with the respect you get. Are you trying to look better than everyone else...no AssWisers Way Are you being Nice and helpful to the community...yes Respectfuls Way Do you think only Inward...No AssWisers Way Do you try to make others look stupid...No AssWisers Way Do you quote "Ok." A something without thats not a sentence with a period, no! You are a Respectful! Not an Asswiser Who are you to determine if a person is trying to look better than everyone else? If I wear nice shoes, does that mean I'm an asswiser that is trying to look better than everyone elses? There are infinite perspectives and there is no solid way of saying a person is trying to look better. You also can't possible say something is a "good" or "bad" classification. For example, looking inward, "introverts", does not mean it is a bad thing. Just because one person does not like to be social or around others doesn't mean that's wrong. Being talkative or not is not something to label as something as good or bad, as you clearly are doing by classifying "asswiser" as bad, otherwise you wouldn't have put the word "ass" in it. Also, what you think as someone trying to make you/others look stupid might be a person trying to help you. If a person encourages a person to spell correctly and hopefully improve their grammar, why is that bad? By your logic, I could say it is "asswiser" to not receive help from others and not learn such things. Bottomline is there is no real way you can classify anyone into three groups and say one is worse than the other. You cannot have all good personality traits, because there is no such thing is something being better than the other. An introvert enjoys work like computers and working in an office. An extrovert likes to be more sociable and may enjoy a job like salesman or working with other people. In fact, you're putting down others by labeling them as "asswiser" and that's a bad thing to be apparently. So by what right do you have to even comment?
[Directed towards Dave Mason] I'm sure you didn't mean to put me down, and i'm sorry if i made you feel guilty. I am planning on going to collage/work and hopefully meet new people, i have respect at school as being the "Head tech" (knowlage in music technolagy and advanced computing (recently done a huge school gig and setup media dept's Mac G5)) by members of staff and they don't want me to leave. I might stay on for another year (2nd year 6thform) depending on my GCSE results. I just hope my life gets better from here on, recently met a girl on my server who throught i was "sweet". If not....... i don't know what i would do.
Sniper_De7 wrote on Wed, 09 August 2006 21:53 In fact, you're putting down others by labeling them as "asswiser" and that's a bad thing to be apparently. So by what right do you have to even comment? I think that you may be onto something. For someone to say that someone is an asswiser, that would be passing judgement, and passing judgement would classify you as an asswiser, as being an "asswiser" is a negative thing, so you would be making yourself out to be better, as you claim yourself capable of deciding who or who isn't an asswiser.
Sniper_De7 wrote on Wed, 09 August 2006 20:53 Darker wrote on Wed, 09 August 2006 20:19 Hard to gain respect? Merovingian, just saying that will have gotten you tons of respect, you have only been here that long and were already have tons of respect and was nominated for Moderator. Why do you insist on pretending you don't get respect. And another thing, it depends on how you go about getting respect, and what you do with the respect you get. Are you trying to look better than everyone else...no AssWisers Way Are you being Nice and helpful to the community...yes Respectfuls Way Do you think only Inward...No AssWisers Way Do you try to make others look stupid...No AssWisers Way Do you quote "Ok." A something without thats not a sentence with a period, no! You are a Respectful! Not an Asswiser Who are you to determine if a person is trying to look better than everyone else? If I wear nice shoes, does that mean I'm an asswiser that is trying to look better than everyone elses? There are infinite perspectives and there is no solid way of saying a person is trying to look better. You also can't possible say something is a "good" or "bad" classification. For example, looking inward, "introverts", does not mean it is a bad thing. Just because one person does not like to be social or around others doesn't mean that's wrong. Being talkative or not is not something to label as something as good or bad, as you clearly are doing by classifying "asswiser" as bad, otherwise you wouldn't have put the word "ass" in it. Also, what you think as someone trying to make you/others look stupid might be a person trying to help you. If a person encourages a person to spell correctly and hopefully improve their grammar, why is that bad? By your logic, I could say it is "asswiser" to not receive help from others and not learn such things. Bottomline is there is no real way you can classify anyone into three groups and say one is worse than the other. You cannot have all good personality traits, because there is no such thing is something being better than the other. An introvert enjoys work like computers and working in an office. An extrovert likes to be more sociable and may enjoy a job like salesman or working with other people. In fact, you're putting down others by labeling them as "asswiser" and that's a bad thing to be apparently. So by what right do you have to even comment? I did not classify anyone, That was my opinion of what i thought he was, which was a good opinion. I only classified what an Asswiser was. And if you think everything i said an Asswiser was, are good things, not bad. than i guess its only opinion, but personally i think they were all bad things. Thinking inward is not a bad thing, but when you only think inward and don't care about anyone else, than i consider that a bad thing. I asked at the beginning of the Post "What do *You think you are or are closest to" So i am really not classifying/labeling anyone . And yeah i think that almost everyone thinks putting people down is a bad thing and so do i, If you don't, i guess its just opinion. So at end of what i said, i should have said "In my Opinion" rather than just saying "You are". My mistake
I guess I'm a "WiseAsser". Darker wrote on Wed, 09 August 2006 18:55 A WiseAsser is a person who thinks he or she Thinks/Wants/Tries or Perhaps is (Under certain point of views) To be better than others, braggers would be under the category. Is it not normal to want to be better than others? Darker wrote on Wed, 09 August 2006 18:55 ...they will put Periods at the end of things that are not even sentences. Speaking of which: Darker And more oftenly not very considerate. Darker But thanks anyways . Darker Or an Asswiser.
Well from what I've seen its not normal to want to be better than others. It is impossible for everyone to be better than everyone else, i don't want to be better, i just want to be happy, which i am . But i understand that partly, there are allot of people that want to be better, unfortunately. I know alot of people are corrupt, but than again there are alot of really good people, and i'm not trying to stop that lol. I just want to know everyones opinion, sorry if i offended anyone, which i do not think i did.
Besides him, me and him have our own bussiness. I'm no stranger to him
Darker wrote on Wed, 09 August 2006 22:23 Well from what I've seen its not normal to want to be better than others. It is impossible for everyone to be better than everyone else, i don't want to be better, i just want to be happy, which i am . But i understand that partly, there are allot of people that want to be better, unfortunately. I know alot of people are corrupt, but than again there are alot of really good people, and i'm not trying to stop that lol. I just want to know everyones opinion, sorry if i offended anyone, which i do not think i did. Why settle for second place? Settling only teaches people not to give it their all because second place isn't bad. If you strive to be better than the next, then you're always going to try and improve yourself. We'll always be imperfect, but that's no excuse to refrain from actually trying. The problem is when you start to think that you're better than everyone else, not wanting to be better.
j_ball430 wrote on Wed, 09 August 2006 22:28 Darker wrote on Wed, 09 August 2006 22:23 Well from what I've seen its not normal to want to be better than others. It is impossible for everyone to be better than everyone else, i don't want to be better, i just want to be happy, which i am . But i understand that partly, there are allot of people that want to be better, unfortunately. I know alot of people are corrupt, but than again there are alot of really good people, and i'm not trying to stop that lol. I just want to know everyones opinion, sorry if i offended anyone, which i do not think i did. Why settle for second place? Settling only teaches people not to give it their all because second place isn't bad. If you strive to be better than the next, then you're always going to try and improve yourself. We'll always be imperfect, but that's no excuse to refrain from actually trying. The problem is when you start to think that you're better than everyone else, not wanting to be better.
Darker wrote on Wed, 09 August 2006 19:34 Everyones different mrpirate, some people read quicker and do not look closely at smaller things like that. But don't stress about it. Quote: These people are more likely to try to make someone else look stupid, perhaps because they are a threat to them in a way or other unknown reasons. And more oftenly not very considerate Alot of this activity is coming from you, MrPirate. You know I'm not the Moee character, yet you have Implied that you think I might be him. Not to mention, you will not tell us what you think you are closest to. Afraid to admit is also a way of the Asswiser. Just look at this. He was saying you reminded him of Moe? Is this bad? Why is it bad? What is he doing here that suggested he was making you look stupid? Also, why is it the ways of the "asswiser" to not admit what you are "closest" too? You do not have any sort of qualifications to be putting traits into a system. Making it entirely invalid. A good system would be one that if a person was say, shy, might also enjoy working in an office, they might also try not to get into people's affairs that don't need their help. You cannot put traits into a good or bad category. An obsessive compulsive person could be considered bad because it involves a lot of unneccessary things, though, in a job like watching air traffic, scrutiny is of the utmost importance and thus it would be a good thing. Likewise, if a teacher tells you to do your homework and is failing you and corrects your grammar, that might be good. A random person on the internet can do the very same, but to you this is somehow different, why? If you're going to make something of a classification system, then do not include what is right or wrong or imply something is better than the other, seeing as how just one interpretation of something is so miniscule and doesn't mean anything. So anyways, if you say someone is doing something that an asswiser would do, which is bad, you are putting them down. You don't have to specifically call them an asswiser to do it, you know. Thus, you are being, in a way, an asswiser yourself (by your definition) This however wouldn't mean I am being it. Since, all I am doing is pointing out to you is that by your own definition you are doing the exact same thing you think is bad. Just a statement and nothing more. So if you would RATHER put up a classification for people who generally do good things or bad things, that's up to you, but this system of yours does neither. And I'm sure if you did do just the classification system for good-bad, that no one is ever pure good or pure bad, especially when there are different interpretations for each case. Would it be completely *bad* if a person wasn't willing to give up his life to save anothers? or even two other lives? Not everyone is capable of giving up their lives for such a cause. From an objective point of view, it would naturally be better that two people survived than one, so does this mean if a person was to be good, he would be willing to give up his life for two others? and if he wasn't that that would be bad? To sum it up: No. No at your classification system. Find one on the internet done by a psychologist. (Maybe introvert/extrovert) That might be something to ask. Though in most cases you'll probably find out that people are most likely introverts online. Though perhaps they once *were* introverts but are now extroverts. That might be something a little bit more solid than the foundations you are working on. ------------------------------------ edit: Not to mention mrpirate has a solid point, I mean you are talking about moe/sensitive when you just registered today. That obviously means you either had an account before, and for some unknown reason you decided to get this new one. Or, you were banned and this is your new account, which is much more likely because I don't see very many people suddenly making new accounts. It's also a good point to mention the fact that the terminology "asswiser" was mentioned by moe/sensitive, which, as far as I know, only moe/sensitive/and apparently YOU know what it is.
This is good amusement, carry on people! lol
I understand what you are saying. Quote: If you strive to be better than the next if you for example are "making for money or being more atrractive or owning a bigger house or a bigger company" Does that really mean you are better than them? Not really. But yes its a problem when you think you are better, rather than saying someone wants to be better, doesn't mean better than other people.
i love the people who come here and post a thred on how bad it is.
I was not as serious about what i started in my earlier posts. Quote: Just look at this. He was saying you reminded him of Moe? Is this bad? Why is it bad? What is he doing here that suggested he was making you look stupid? I never said he was trying to make me look stupid. Quote: Also, why is it the ways of the "asswiser" to not admit what you are "closest" too? by "the way of" is like a symptom, doesn't really mean anything yet. Quote: You do not have any sort of qualifications to be putting traits into a system. They are not Traits being put into a system, only Opinions and Terms that I came up with , No one is to say what a "Good" system would be. Quote: So anyways, if you say someone is doing something that an asswiser would do, which is bad, you are putting them down. You don't have to specifically call them an asswiser to do it, you know. Thus, you are being, in a way, an asswiser yourself (by your definition) This however wouldn't mean I am being it. Since, all I am doing is pointing out to you is that by your own definition you are doing the exact same thing you think is bad. Just a statement and nothing more. I never said an an Asswiser was a bad thing, just because it has ass in it, does not mean anything. So there for, i would not be putting anyone down. Quote: So if you would RATHER put up a classification for people who generally do good things or bad things, that's up to you, but this system of yours does neither. And I'm sure if you did do just the classification system for good-bad, that no one is ever pure good or pure bad, especially when there are different interpretations for each case. Would it be completely *bad* if a person wasn't willing to give up his life to save anothers? or even two other lives? Not everyone is capable of giving up their lives for such a cause. From an objective point of view, it would naturally be better that two people survived than one, so does this mean if a person was to be good, he would be willing to give up his life for two others? and if he wasn't that that would be bad? I never said one was Good or bad, its just 2 typed of people that think differently, do different things, i guess in my opinion one is good and the other is bad, but thats just opinion. If you think an my definition of an Asswiser is a "Good person" Thats just opinion Lol. Sorry if i made it out to be a classification system.
when you say "which one of these three are you" and only three are available none of which say "something different than what i posted" that is classifying. It'd be the same way if there was a vote saying are you gay or are you straight. Just not enough options and you aren't suggesting that there is more beyond the three, especially since you say "how come you aren't choosing one of the three?" Maybe because a person is something completely different? Or haven't you thought of that. Also... Darker wrote on Wed, 09 August 2006 19:34 Everyones different mrpirate, some people read quicker and do not look closely at smaller things like that. But don't stress about it. Quote: These people are more likely to try to make someone else look stupid, perhaps because they are a threat to them in a way or other unknown reasons. And more oftenly not very considerate Alot of this activity is coming from you, MrPirate. You know I'm not the Moee character, yet you have Implied that you think I might be him. Not to mention, you will not tell us what you think you are closest to. Afraid to admit is also a way of the Asswiser. when you say "this activity" you are saying he is doing the suggested (this being "people...try to make someone else look stupid" If he WASN'T doing this, you wouldn't have said he was doing it, would you? You also didn't say why being like moe is necessarily something negative. when you say "the way of" you imply he is doing something that an asswiser would do. "An asswiser's way would do this. Thus, if you do this, too, you are in the way of an asswiser" you imply that asswiser is bad, just by the name. Yes, having the word ass, and then adding wiser on it, implies you are saying it is a bad thing. If I called you a fuckwit, fuckwit, are you going to think it may not be an insult? Even so, you also imply being an asswiser is bad because you say in your own opinions so and so is bad, and you also say that this so and so is apparently the ways of an asswiser, so yes, you are very much implying asswiser as being bad. edit: Oh I just reread I guess at some point someone said asswiser instead of the original "wiseasser" you put in. Which would go with being a wiseass, which is a bad thing globally. So uh, yeah...
Quote: when you say "which one of these three are you" and only three are available none of which say "something different than what i posted" that is classifying. It'd be the same way if there was a vote saying are you gay or are you straight. Just not enough options and you aren't suggesting that there is more beyond the three, especially since you say "how come you aren't choosing one of the three?" Maybe because a person is something completely different? Or haven't you thought of that. After i said "which one of these three are you" I said "Or are you closest to" I did consider the fact that there was only three options, so i put that. Quote: when you say "this activity" you are saying he is doing the suggested (this being "people...try to make someone else look stupid" If he WASN'T doing this, you wouldn't have said he was doing it, would you? You also didn't say why being like moe is necessarily something negative. Well, moe did post alot of strange things....not to be mean or anything lol, but don't forget, in a way moee is an artificial character. You cannot hurt one. Quote: when you say "the way of" you imply he is doing something that an asswiser would do. "An asswiser's way would do this. Thus, if you do this, too, you are in the way of an asswiser" I was not Implying that at all lol Quote: you imply that asswiser is bad, just by the name. Yes, having the word ass, and then adding wiser on it, implies you are saying it is a bad thing. If I called you a fuckwit, fuckwit, are you going to think it may not be an insult? Even so, you also imply being an asswiser is bad because you say in your own opinions so and so is bad, and you also say that this so and so is apparently the ways of an asswiser, so yes, you are very much implying asswiser as being bad. Yes but only in my opinion is an Asswiser "Bad" But who does not think these type of people are bad? Everyone has had issues with these type of people I'm sure. and Alot of people have said they think they are Asswisers but probably are not. Z310 from my point of view is not an Asswiser at all, he is very considerate.
If I went to a forum and saw someone who posted a thread that listed three ways to identify yourself, two of which were negative and the descriptions of which seemed to be specifically worded to describe certain people's characteristics, and had a sarcastic avatar mocking the perception that various people act superior to others, I would call him a troll. And I think that would fit into category A. That's just my opinion. Maybe I'm wrong. But maybe I'm not.
Hmm. I actually thought he was help-linux on a different IP.
z310 wrote on Thu, 10 August 2006 02:04 Hmm. I actually thought he was help-linux on a different IP. I thought so too. What if you aren't one of the 3? Then you're just left out? ;(
Ralphzehunter wrote on Thu, 10 August 2006 00:43 z310 wrote on Thu, 10 August 2006 02:04 Hmm. I actually thought he was help-linux on a different IP. I thought so too. Nah. It is just becoming more common on these forums to get these weird new registered users who steal other peoples Avatars.
So... I say "Ok." always, guess I'm a wiseass then?
Im sure its been mentioned once but This guys putting a few people down as wiseassers. Watch his avatar. IF IM CORRECT WA's talk smack according to you right? Then YOU Yourself are a wise asser because of your avatar. New read out. for Darker Do You make a post that catagorzes people>? YES -Wise asser Do you catagorize other people? /yes -wise asser. Do you appologize when You realize you've done something wrong that may have hurt someones feelings? Yes -Respectful According to your system you 2/3 wise asser thats just your system, This isnt a match to a war either if you get my drift. I dislike flame wars alot and just needed to point out this to you.
M1Garand8 wrote on Thu, 10 August 2006 10:35 So... I say "Ok." always, guess I'm a wiseass then? Not quite, 2 things. Do you say "OK." with a period, or without? asswisers ussually say things like "Ah huh." and "Heh." Not ever forgetting the period. If they happen to forget the period(Which is unlikely) It tends to make them angery, and ussually when that happens, the person they are/were talking to when they forgot their Period! Will now be there target!
I'm not going to label myself. I can't even be labeled anyways.
Darker wrote on Fri, 11 August 2006 01:25 M1Garand8 wrote on Thu, 10 August 2006 10:35 So... I say "Ok." always, guess I'm a wiseass then? Not quite, 2 things. Do you say "OK." with a period, or without? asswisers ussually say things like "Ah huh." and "Heh." Not ever forgetting the period. If they happen to forget the period(Which is unlikely) It tends to make them angery, and ussually when that happens, the person they are/were talking to when they forgot their Period! Will now be there target! I do that anyway, except that I don't get angry if I miss the fullstop, because I don't ****ing care.
Knock off all this "ZOMG U HAVE A GAY SERVER" "GOZTOW SUX" "I CANT SEE YOUR TOPIC BEYOND THE GLARING GRAMMATICS" Get back to Wiseassers and Respectfuls and Lefts.
I'm a mixture of all 3 types
icedog90 wrote on Thu, 10 August 2006 17:20 I'm not going to label myself. I can't even be labeled anyways. You can be labled as mod.
"Mod" is only one letter away from "god," anyway.
icedog90 wrote on Sun, 13 August 2006 07:07 hmm. I agree.
and next in this gripping topic, what color is actual shit? o/