Command and Conquer: Renegade Official Forums - RDF feed
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Has anyone seen the info about C&C 3?I was looking at planet C&C when i noticed an announcement from HeXetic stating that on pc gamer magazine for june,C&C 3 is announced.If you haven't read this check it out . http://planetcnc.gamespy.com
Hmm, no info on the game itself though? That sucks. I'll probably be a bastardized C&C like Generals was...
So I hear they're making Renegade 2!
I hope I'm getting that issue; my aunt just resubscribed me...
OT: Renegade 2 would kick ass. Imagine Renegade 1, only with better graphics and none of it's hinderances, like lack of fixed-wing aircraft, and AI that isn't as dumb as Monkey_Bone. Maybe even a single player campagin for Nod? But C&C 3, new race...The Scrin? I don't see how they can put the Scrin in and keep the game balenced...
time to wait... I'm sure it will take forever
Supposedly 2007 but we know how EA is never on time
http://www.cnc-source.com/forums/index.php?act=ST&f=40&a mp;t=4769&st=0 Do I see the word "SHOOTERS" on the top left beside Genre?!
Why do i see the USA emblem from generals on the back of orcalooking aircraft........ Nice spotting goarmy
I don't know, but it does say something about "...GDI's Orca gunship..." in the description.
Just as long as you can see more than four to six buildings of your base at any given time. Oh, and as long as it's not as laggy as Generals. And as long as it still uses WOL (ermm, XWIS), unlike Generals. And as long as it's in the Tiberium universe rather than the Red Alert universe.
And aslong as EA learned atleast something about C&C games over the past few years
Kamuix wrote on Tue, 18 April 2006 18:46 And aslong as EA learned atleast something about C&C games over the past few years Capitalistic corporation learning something? Only thing they will have learned is how to make a game in a year and completely drop support in a twelfth of the time.
It's a good thing everybody here likes Generals!
It is certain this will be nothing like C&C. Just looking at the logo will tell you that.
Hey, what if they decided to combine all the c&c universes into one big one with C&C3? That would be funny and might make a good game
Guys, if you actually look closely, that logo isn't the same.
Happyness overload!
Maybe its the new GDI logo :\. Even though i kinda doubt it.
That logo is still not the good old GDI logo. I suspect they just took that asset out of generals and crapped up a texture. I wouldn't be buying it if everything changed (it looks like it.) EA will never learn..........
Lol no one likes ea? And yes if you look close its not the same logo. Have some trust in these guys! (generals wasnt bad!)
They might be trying to fill in the gap between generals and the tiberian universe.
I'd rather they fill in the gap between the Red Alert and Tiberian universes. Generals seems way too far out there to make it work. It might be that for those models they used concept stuff from Generals, which is why the very similar logo would be there.
http://darkzero.co.uk/news.php?newsid=9354 Quote: According to the PC Gamer article the story behind the new C&C game revolves around the world been thrown into chaos due to the spread of Tiberium. As a result 20% of the Earth's surface has become Tiberium-infested and is now inhospitable (these areas are Red Zones). Tiberium hasn't fully taken hold of 50% of the Earth (these areas are Yellow Zones) and the rest of the Earth is more or less safe (these areas are called Blue/Green zones) this area is also where the GDI is headquartered. The GDI is trying to prevent the spread of Tiberium and convert the Yellow Zones to Blue Zones. The only other information the article give us it that the game will use the SAGE engine (from C&C Generals) but it will be heavily modified. It also says Kane will be returning and Live-action scenes will be making a comeback to the C&Cverse . EA also promises C&C3 will evolve real-time strategy games as we know them today but will also be faithful sequel to the series. Not much else is known about the title, but we expect loads more information will be presented during the week of E3. We also expect the game will play a big part of EA's plans at the show itself.
Finally EA realizes that the live action scenes are a good thing.
Chronojam wrote on Wed, 19 April 2006 02:24 It's a good thing everybody here likes Generals! Maybe GDI and Nod merged since they were fighting vs cabal... And the new race is cabal with the aliens...
kreimkouk wrote on Wed, 19 April 2006 07:25 Lol no one likes ea? And yes if you look close its not the same logo. Have some trust in these guys! (generals wasnt bad!) No one likes EA. Maybe you liked Generals, but anyone who likes C&C knows that Generals was only another way for EA to rip us off. It had absolutely nothing to do with either the Red Alert universe or the Tiberian universe.
Well people, say Hello! To Tiberium Wars!
Er... Got an English version on you? My German isn't to good.
Dutch, whatever. Either way, I don't know the language.
Hmm...closer I think. But judging by what Phoenixx posted, it's probably not crossing over there. -RA: 1950s -RA2: 1970s -RA/TS crossover: 1980s-1990s -Original C&C: late 1990s-early 2000s -C&C 3: ? -Tiberian Sun: 2030s
If anyone missed the GS article, here it is: http://www.gamespot.com/pages/news/show_blog_entry.php?topic _id=24536748
O_o General Havoc!! I dreampt of the day you would return!
Heres a close up of the logo
That skull on his helmet does sort of look like a Dead-6 logo..
That close up looks like an eagle flying out of it... If you turn the GDI logo around, it could look like that. =/
http://www.apathbeyond.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=8310&am p;st=165&#entry165381 More news, scans, and I've posted what's likely the concept art they're going to be basing things on..
Starcraft meets Command and Conquer + sex with Dawn of War.
At least they're doing the live action cut-scenes. I missed those, and it's kind of faithful of them to do so. But then, it's more for them to screw up pretty easily. I honestly don't want to make myself believe right away that it will suck. No matter how many times they screw things up, and no matter how much I hate the company, I always feel like hoping they continue the C&C series without screwing it up so freaking much.
http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h129/codecat42/cnc3pcg_cov er.jpg http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h129/codecat42/cnc3pcg_pag e1.jpg http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h129/codecat42/cnc3pcg_pag e2.jpg http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h129/codecat42/cnc3pcg_pag e3.jpg http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h129/codecat42/cnc3pcg_pag e4.jpg http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h129/codecat42/cnc3pcg_pag e5.jpg http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h129/codecat42/cnc3pcg_pag e6.jpg http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h129/codecat42/cnc3pcg_pag e7.jpg Here ya go XD
So it is the Brotherhood of NOD now.
Your welcome for getting those scans =P I really hope they don't screw this up.
Even if they do, they can't completely kill it's value. The fact that it has "Command & Conquer" in the title, and is even a half-assed attempt at another game will make it worthwhile. My biggest fear is that they'll scrap the whole thing. That would suck...
Takes place in 2047? And only 20% of the land is inhospitable? Tiberian Sun was 20-ish years prior and it was a lot more than that covered by tiberium. Maybe GDI made a lot of progress with it in that time. Kinda sucks for Solomon and the Philadelphia though.
http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h129/codecat42/cnc3pcg_pag e3.jpg Read that. It seems like EA has actually put in some effort so far. " 'We've researched the way Tiberium works down the atomic level' says Verdu. With help of scientists from the Massacusetts Institue of Technology, the team devised a scientific bible for the game...."
Sounds like they gathered up a bunch of grad students and asked them to fabricate some bullshit about tiberium together.
concept
idebo wrote on Thu, 20 April 2006 08:08 Ew ew ew ew ew ew. why?
icedog90 wrote on Thu, 20 April 2006 13:56 idebo wrote on Thu, 20 April 2006 08:08 Ew ew ew ew ew ew. why? The.... uh.... armor on the GIs looks.... real stupid so high up on their shoulders. =/ Looks too much like Starcraft.
Why do they named it Command & Conquer... that's just spoiling it all! MILK THE COW! MILK THE COW! Oh well, who cares anyway.
I croped and shadded the pics.
And made a background out of one.
I find it kind of sad how a lot of you are trying so hard to find flaws with it already. I seriously can't find anything really wrong with anything so far, besides the fact that it's being made by the most evil game company in the world.
It's a simple matter of reactive judging.
We're just concerned about its quality, since this will be the first game of the Tiberian series not made by Westwood. It's like when your sister goes out with some guy with a nose ring. You naturally hate it, but you hope he'll end up being a doctor or something. But usually she ends up pregnant and homeless.
I can easily understand that, but trying to find ways to diss it is just retarded.
After this game is out, the odds of it ever being balanced, and without gameplay affecting bugs: 0 The odds of it being as bad(or maybe even worse) as Generals: 100000000000000000 I am not saying that Generals is a bad game, but I have played worse. For some reason. I don't really like RTS games any more, mainly because I suck at them(but not allways), and that they become old and boring very fast. It is strange that in the old days, I could play Tiberian Dawn over and over and over, and still would not get bored with it, but that was probably because I was about 8 and I played it like huge noob using sandbag walls to prevent AI from attacking me, and then using orcas mostly to win, except in the last mission where after I destroyed all SAM sites, they would be rebuild again. But for some reason, the new RTS games, and RTS games in general are getting old fast because once most people learn everything about the game, they begin to use same tactics over and over and over, and the game becomes a borng chore. How come Renegade never becomes old? It is probably because it is a FPS game and those kind of games almost never become old.
Well, it seems as if they are putting forth effort at least. At this point, I can only ask them to take their best shot at it because they're all we've got.
I disagree. StarCraft still hasn't gotten old, and that game is ancient.
Dover wrote on Fri, 21 April 2006 12:14 I disagree. StarCraft still hasn't gotten old, and that game is ancient. I agree 400% with this statement. Though making Starcraft: Ghost may or may not be a big mistake for Blizzard.
Terminator 101 wrote on Fri, 21 April 2006 03:45 The odds of it being as bad(or maybe even worse) as Generals: 100000000000000000 100000000000000000 what? Liters, grams, percent, pizzas.
Starcraft: Ghost is no loner comming out. Blizzard has gone to the next-gen consoles, and Starcraft: Ghost may or may not be updated. But as it is, Starcraft: Ghost is no longer coming out for the current-gen consoles. http://xbox.ign.com/articles/698/698434p1.html
warranto wrote on Fri, 21 April 2006 12:33 Starcraft: Ghost is no loner comming out. Blizzard has gone to the next-gen consoles, and Starcraft: Ghost may or may not be updated. But as it is, Starcraft: Ghost is no longer coming out for the current-gen consoles. http://xbox.ign.com/articles/698/698434p1.html For supplying me with this imformation, you have now become awesome in my eyes. Now, with this post, hopefully the offtopicness will end. [/hopefulendtoofftopic]
StarCraft Ghost sucked anyways. Not because it's StarCraft, because StarCraft is awesome... but because it was slated only for game consoles. A true game "console" is a large conventional computer with a lot more gaming power than game consoles.
Kanezor, this has been bugging me: how many winners you got from your siggy?
Goztow wrote on Fri, 21 April 2006 15:12 Kanezor, this has been bugging me: how many winners you got from your siggy? It's a .jpg, dude.
Lijitsu wrote on Sat, 22 April 2006 12:01 Goztow wrote on Fri, 21 April 2006 15:12 Kanezor, this has been bugging me: how many winners you got from your siggy? It's a .jpg, dude. That deserves a rofl.
Goztow wrote on Fri, 21 April 2006 20:12 Kanezor, this has been bugging me: how many winners you got from your siggy?
Goztow wrote on Fri, 21 April 2006 14:12 Kanezor, this has been bugging me: how many winners you got from your siggy? ROFLLYMAYYIONAISEOMGWTFLOLHAHA It's a subliminal message that anyone who reads it is not a winner (and that I am, since they aren't). It supports my elitist ego.
DJM wrote on Sat, 22 April 2006 12:43 Goztow wrote on Fri, 21 April 2006 20:12 Kanezor, this has been bugging me: how many winners you got from your siggy? I'm quoting this purely so Goztows block list won't filter it.
Kanezor wrote on Fri, 21 April 2006 20:54 It supports my elitist ego. A-men to elitist ego.
Sarcasm rules, doesn't it?
RTsa wrote on Sat, 22 April 2006 06:16 Sarcasm rules, doesn't it? OK, most people didn't understand but it was sarcasm indeed...
Goztow wrote on Sat, 22 April 2006 13:36 RTsa wrote on Sat, 22 April 2006 06:16 Sarcasm rules, doesn't it? OK, most people didn't understand but it was sarcasm indeed... As untrue as we all know that is, if you do truly believe that you were being 'sarcastic' I think you should check the definition. http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=sarcasm
DJM wrote on Sat, 22 April 2006 08:57 Goztow wrote on Sat, 22 April 2006 13:36 RTsa wrote on Sat, 22 April 2006 06:16 Sarcasm rules, doesn't it? OK, most people didn't understand but it was sarcasm indeed... As untrue as we all know that is, if you do truly believe that you were being 'sarcastic' I think you should check the definition. http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=sarcasm Indeed.
2 more persons just made it to my ignore list...
Goztow wrote on Sat, 22 April 2006 14:37 2 more persons just made it to my ignore list... ROFL!
More new C&C 3 pics including a Nod (Or Scrin?) mech on www.apathbeyond.com
Chronojam wrote on Sun, 23 April 2006 06:26 More new C&C 3 pics including a Nod (Or Scrin?) mech on www.apathbeyond.com Why don't you ever give a direct link to the topic?
Goztow wrote on Sun, 23 April 2006 14:52 Chronojam wrote on Sun, 23 April 2006 06:26 More new C&C 3 pics including a Nod (Or Scrin?) mech on www.apathbeyond.com Why don't you ever give a direct link to the topic? Why are you too lazy to spend 1 measly minute finding them?
http://www.apathbeyond.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=8310&am p;st=315
Was it that hard linking the images to here? It takes less than a minute...
didnt Joe Kucan leave when they shut down WW? if so how are they going to do kane?
Yeah, he did. Hopefully they'll hire him back for this, because according to an old interview, he said he'd go back and work for them for free. Here's the link: http://www.imperium-ww.pl/articles.php?article_id=33
havoc9826 wrote on Sun, 23 April 2006 18:38 http://www.imperium-ww.pl/articles.php?article_id=33 Jackass? That sounds like something someone called me at work! Like, a year and a half ago... when I still had work. He does have some pretty fun answers though.
I at least hope that EA realizes that without Kucan as Kane, or even a Tiberian-series game without Kane, they'll completely lose what loyal following they still have with their RTS games. Not that they won't pick up kiss-ass gamers who are also fascinated with shiny objects and puppies to buy their games, but whatever.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Command_%26_Conquer:_Tiberian_T wilight this igame is what poster from tdf are for i can see the tank in one of my pic i have
The EA community manager, aka APOC, informed us that he read over 2000 + posts about c&c 3 and that they'll try to take the remarks in account.
Good for him. I refuse to get my hopes up again though.
I am not getting my hopes up about a stategy game by EA. But i think EA might be alittle more succesful with this C&C game.
Those maps remind me of MechCommander for some reason.