Command and Conquer: Renegade Official Forums - RDF feed
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
nowdays every fucking topic, that ACK(*gasp*, i said the A word! ) posts in turns into a flame war, and its as if hes doing it on purpose, going though peoples posts searching for a spelling/grammer mistake & commenting on it if we were that concerned about our spelling, crimson would of installed a spell checker onto the forums, but has she? NO! :rolleyes: he dousnt even play renegade even more, & he thinks it sucks, so why is he posting here? because he enjoys ruining threads its practically impossible to have a decent thread in here without it turning into a flame war about how its Nod not NOD :rolleyes: http://www.renegadeforums.com/search.php?search_author=Aircraftkiller i think that link speaks for itself
Yes, he should but if it was going to happen it would have happened a long time ago.
Suspension is what i would like to happen. Standards would have to be set, such as: 5 days for a bear skin picture... etc etc
Quote: Remember, it's before, not b4. Remember, it's I, not i. Remember, it's meantime, not mean time. Remember, it's don't, not dont. Remember, it's a while, not awhile. Remember, it's God, not god. Remember, it's because, not cuz. Remember, it's sweating, not sweatin. Remember, it's telling, not tellen. Remember, it's fuck, not f*ck. Remember, it's their, not there. Remember, it's isn't, not isnt. O_o
Everyone else who replied to his posts that continued the flame war (or, in some cases start it) should be banned too.
Sir Phoenixx Everyone else who replied to his posts that continued the flame war (or, in some cases start it) should be banned too. Nein. I was also thinking about this. I don't see Aircraftkiller actually helping with anything anymore, all he does it try to defame Renegade and the work of BHS (keep in mind Renegade is what BHS does).
Crimson already said she won't ban him, she said to just ignore him and then she'll actually help out.
his gonna have a field day with this post like i said before this Link works very well
You know what I do when I see a post by Aircraftkiller that starts a nice little flame war? I IGNORE the ensuing flame posts or ignore the whole topic all together. That's right, I have RESTRAINT and I don't add to the flame wars. I just find the hypocricy of these types of posts/topics to be quite funny. You're the ones who ADD to the flame war, and then call for someone to get banned because you guys don't have enough self-control to stop yourselves from contributing to the flame war. Congratulations, you're all a bunch of whiny children who, when can't fix the problem by themselves, run to the closest authority to get them to fix the problem for them.
"Fighting fire with fire creates more fire."
Aircraftkiller is very annoying. And I agree with that. But like some people say, just ignore him, completely. He has never even posted on one of my topics before...I wonder why...
If there is some one you don't like, just put them on the ignor list. That is why it is there... Only you can prevent forest fires! I mean flame wars!
egg098 "Fighting fire with fire creates more fire." How do you think they put out oil rig fires?
You know there's something seriously wrong with the quality of your life when you have nearly 5000 posts on a forum devoted to something you pretend to hate.
icedog90 Crimson already said she won't ban him, she said to just ignore him and then she'll actually help out. That is unfortunate. He should be banned for making so many threads spiral off topic. ...And it isn't the fault of the people replying to his posts. If he didn't make asshole remarks and correct everyone on everything, then MANY more topics would stay on track. Like I said before, these forums are becoming a joke simply because of the sheer volume of threads that go off topic because of him. It is sad to think that he is a total nuisance, that many people want hime gone and yet at the same time, it is already decided that he is not going to be banned. That is like giving him permission to do whatever he wants. If it was up to me, I would opt to preserve the quality of these forums rather than keep him around. :rolleyes: As for the ignore feature, it isn't going to be any use untill almost everyone ignores him. I have him ignored already, and others do to, but threads still go off topic because of his posts.
Remember people, it takes one to be an annoyance, but two to fight.
...Therefore we remove the annoyance and there will be no fight.
Actually it takes nothing to be an annoyance. What annoys you is what you allow, no one controls your emotions except yourself. Quote: 6.32 posts per day That's my averaged post count... Six posts per day over the course of two years?
If there was a thorn in my ass, I wouldn't ignore it and pretend that it wasn't annoying...I would get rid of it. I don't read your posts and then cry and sulk over them. I'm not emotionally effected in any way. But an annoyance is an annoyance, and it should be dealt with.
REMEMBER KIDS THE INTERNET IS SERIOUS BUSINESS
IRON FART ...Therefore we remove the annoyance and there will be no fight. You do realize how many people would be banned if Crimson were to do that to everyone who falls under this category, right? Of course, everyone could always just take the previously suggested solution, and ignore those who would detract from what is being discussed. The topic wouldn't even deviate if people didn't respond to the attempt to derail the topic.
No, that's obviously too hard. You know what, I find all of you annoying. You should be banned, because I don't like you.
Quote: Should ACK be banned? Yes
Should Nightma12 be banned? Of course!
j_ball430 You know what I do when I see a post by Aircraftkiller that starts a nice little flame war? I IGNORE the ensuing flame posts or ignore the whole topic all together. That's right, I have RESTRAINT and I don't add to the flame wars. I just find the hypocricy of these types of posts/topics to be quite funny. You're the ones who ADD to the flame war, and then call for someone to get banned because you guys don't have enough self-control to stop yourselves from contributing to the flame war. Congratulations, you're all a bunch of whiny children who, when can't fix the problem by themselves, run to the closest authority to get them to fix the problem for them. I always remembered you liking to argue, and at that why dont you reply? Afraid AK will kick your ass at the little flamewar/argument?
IRON FART icedog90 Crimson already said she won't ban him, she said to just ignore him and then she'll actually help out. That is unfortunate. He should be banned for making so many threads spiral off topic. ...And it isn't the fault of the people replying to his posts. If he didn't make asshole remarks and correct everyone on everything, then MANY more topics would stay on track. Like I said before, these forums are becoming a joke simply because of the sheer volume of threads that go off topic because of him. It is sad to think that he is a total nuisance, that many people want hime gone and yet at the same time, it is already decided that he is not going to be banned. That is like giving him permission to do whatever he wants. If it was up to me, I would opt to preserve the quality of these forums rather than keep him around. :rolleyes: As for the ignore feature, it isn't going to be any use untill almost everyone ignores him. I have him ignored already, and others do to, but threads still go off topic because of his posts. he must be feedin miss piggy
Doitle
No. Surprisng answer, perhaps. But as warranto stated, a lot more people would be banned on this forum if we simply used the "he's annoying" referance. How about we ban people with annoying and crude signatures? How about we ban people who do not use the letter "e" once per sentance? How about we pay homage to minipeace, because that's about as full of crap as you are. When you get those three things sorted, Nightma, ask again for ACK to be banned.
Nightma12 Should ACK be banned? Sure, no skin offa my back..oops, I mean texture.
warranto IRON FART ...Therefore we remove the annoyance and there will be no fight. You do realize how many people would be banned if Crimson were to do that to everyone who falls under this category, right? Of course, everyone could always just take the previously suggested solution, and ignore those who would detract from what is being discussed. The topic wouldn't even deviate if people didn't respond to the attempt to derail the topic. 1. I don't think anyone here is seen as an annoyance as much as him. 2. If EVERYONE could always just take the previously suggested solution and do whatever, then we'd be living in a fantasy land. EVERYONE isn't going to do shit. I'll give you a a dollar when EVERYONE here ignores his posts.
The day I ban ACK for his behavior is the day I also ban the people who respond to his stupid topic derailment posts. I can remove the posts, yes, but it's insanely difficult and time-consuming to try and fix an off-topic thread. Remember, YOU enable him to take a thread off topic when you respond to him. Resist the urge and IGNORE it.
Quote: And it isn't the fault of the people replying to his posts. If he didn't make asshole remarks and correct everyone on everything, then MANY more topics would stay on track. No, it is their fault for replying to his posts. Threads don't go off topic because of his one post, they go off topic because people continue to reply to his post, after which said people then whine that the thread went off topic when they are the ones that helped (although some times they solely cause it to go off topic) derail it.
How about we just ban everybody? That should end 100% of all the flame wars.
I agree that if someone helps a community rarely yet is very annoying that they should just be ignored when they are annoying. HOWEVER Whats the point in keeping them around if they are only annoying and never help? ACK is not willing to help the renegade community nor participate with any parts of it. He just cares about himself and thinks hes always doing the right thing. What good is he doing here? Thats what you have to ask not is he annoying, retarded and fucked up. If he wants to be that way let him. Why keep him around though if he won't contribute?
So I should ban everyone who doesn't contribute and is annoying? That's a whole shitload of bans.
Actually it wouldn't be that many if you interpretted people who contribute simply to be people who browse the forums and make some effort to help or encourage conversation. ACK does the exact opposite. He is also considered annoying by 3/4's of the people on these forums.
Have half of you even realized that he derails topics because it's so easy to do with you and your fickle emotions? Has it ever came across in your minds as to maybe he does this because he knows he can get a rise out of you morons with minimal effort? The ones who ignore him are on the right track. By adding him to your ignore list or having enough restraint as to not fall victim to his (easily avoidable) trap then this thread wouldn't be needed. Instead, you're blaming HIM because YOU can't stop yourselves from replying to him. It takes 2 to tango.
That is farfetched to ban someone just because they don't contribute. Lots of people here haven't contributed much. Even if topics didn't go off topic because of ACK, personally I would ban him for correcting everyone incessantly on the most insignificant things and purposely being an annoyance. After all, pretty much the only reason he comes here is to annoy people. Am I getting through to you, Crimson, or is your mind already made up?
And you think ACK doesn't encourage conversation? If he made things so horrible, then why do you still visit here?
To tell you the truth I don't try and start casual conversation on these forums as much as I would if he was gone. I find that he almost always interferes and disrupts things. I go on other forums for casual conversation. I come here to keep updated in the server owners forum thats pretty much it.
IRON FART After all, pretty much the only reason he comes here is to annoy people. Ever think as to why he does? Maybe you should think outside the box and look for the motive behind his actions rather than just his actions. While I'm not him, I'm pretty sure that his whole point of annoying people is, again, because he can do it with little effort. One little sentence somehow forces 10+ people to respond to him. Instead, you could just skip over his post, and then what he said doesn't even come into play. Then again, that'd actually take restraint.
A hawaii-based dog foundation saved this dog by not taking him off topic. Contribute now to save more dogs, build a family and let more dogs enjoy their lives as much as we do!
Crimson And you think ACK doesn't encourage conversation? If he made things so horrible, then why do you still visit here? Because he is only one out of the many people that come here. I'm not going to stop because of one annoying person. Also, don't presume that he makes anything so horrible that I'd stop coming here. He probably thinks he's really getting to me, but the truth is that he is just a really really annoying pest. I still want to visit these forums, but I don't like hanging around somewhere where there is some 20 something year old loser who hangs around trying to piss me and others off. If I add ACK to my ignore list, then I will have to add everyone who replies to his asshole remarks to my ignore list also. Quote: Am I getting through to you, Crimson, or is your mind already made up? Answer??? Am I wasting my time talking to you or is there any hope of doing anything about ACK? Quote: Ever think as to why he does? Maybe you should think outside the box and look for the motive behind his actions rather than just his actions. Hold on - There is a reason for annoying people? LOL
IRON FART Quote: Ever think as to why he does? Maybe you should think outside the box and look for the motive behind his actions rather than just his actions. Hold on - There is a reason for annoying people? LOL There's always a reason to everything.
OK then. Tell me: What is ACK's reason for coming here to annoy people?
Only ACK knows the answer to that.
I would have said yes a long time ago but now I just shrugg it off. If he aides in getting a topic, off-topic then I just realize nothing has changed and never will. This place called the Renegade Forums has been home to many of for many years. There are not many of us here left that were members on the official WW Renegade Forums but there it was no different either. I was actually banned once from those forums because of fighting with ACK so much. My nick was Creed3020 and I re-registered as Creed3022. I might have "learned my lesson" but I learned that certain individuals will always hold more weight with who is upstairs then you will and there is little to nothing you can do about. So I continue posting where I can helping others out where others have not been able to. You may dismise the ignore feature but it will help you start to build up a tolerance to what goes on here in one of 6.22 posts.
IRON FART Crimson And you think ACK doesn't encourage conversation? If he made things so horrible, then why do you still visit here? Because he is only one out of the many people that come here. I'm not going to stop because of one annoying person. Also, don't presume that he makes anything so horrible that I'd stop coming here. He probably thinks he's really getting to me, but the truth is that he is just a really really annoying pest. I still want to visit these forums, but I don't like hanging around somewhere where there is some 20 something year old loser who hangs around trying to piss me and others off. If I add ACK to my ignore list, then I will have to add everyone who replies to his asshole remarks to my ignore list also. Quote: Am I getting through to you, Crimson, or is your mind already made up? Answer??? Am I wasting my time talking to you or is there any hope of doing anything about ACK? Quote: Ever think as to why he does? Maybe you should think outside the box and look for the motive behind his actions rather than just his actions. Hold on - There is a reason for annoying people? LOL Perhaps it's us who are not getting through. The ignore button is there for a reason, use it. If Aircraftkiller goes off on one of his tirades, ignore it. If people start responding, and the conversation goes way off course, ignore it. Let them have their own little discussion. Remember, you contribute to the derailment as much as he does when you reply to the topic.
but what happens if he derails a topic you start and you arent the one replying to him and its the others that are doing it? Make another topic for him to de-rail? Personally, I don't like making topics that ultimately turn into flame wars or a discussion on vocabulary or grammar. It gets old people. Ignoring him won't make him go away unless EVERYONE does it. But we all know everyone won't.
So because others can restrain themselves then the only solution is that Aircraftkiller is banned? PERFECT logic. Here's a scenario with that logic used: I'm failing a class in college. This means that I should kill the teacher. I mean, obviously it's NOT my fault for not doing the work necessary to pass it. She's the one who is causing me to fail because she's the one who is giving me the homework, so obviously killing her is the perfect way to get out of failing.
gbull but what happens if he derails a topic you start and you arent the one replying to him and its the others that are doing it? Make another topic for him to de-rail? Personally, I don't like making topics that ultimately turn into flame wars or a discussion on vocabulary or grammar. It gets old people. Ignoring him won't make him go away unless EVERYONE does it. But we all know everyone won't. Example of the solution. (Slight exageration,, don't take offense) gbull: "Hey everyone! NOD stole the stealth technology!" j_ball430: "Wow, where did you learn this?" Aircraftkiller: "It's Nod, not NOD" Nightma12: "Shut up ACK" Aircraftkiller "It's Aircraftkiller, not ACK" gbull: "I found it on the website for Tiberium Twilight" IRON FART: "Shut up ACK, stop derailing the topic" j_ball430: "wow, interesting" Aircraftkiller "It's Aircraftkiller, not ACK" gbull: "It is interesting" -END- In this example, the topic was derailed. However all those interested in the topic ignored it, and the original discussion remains intact.
Sorry, but it seems overly apparent that there are extraneous circumstances which preclude those in power from having any sort of "control" or placing any type of restraints on the actual person at fault. This reeks of a new-age child psychology exercise when you use the words "enabler" and demand that others simply ignore the offender. When a kid steps out of line you smack them on the butt and demand that they stop their behavior, you don't pass the blame on to those around them because then YOU are becoming the enabler. If you have no desire to enact consequences for actions because the offender is a friend, simply say that instead of pretending that it's everyone else's fault. At least then everyone will know where you stand and can shut up and move along. Quote: If he made things so horrible, then why do you still visit here? Look at my post count. Warranto: Instead of telling everyone it's their fault for not being able to ignore it, why not at least publicly tell Ack to shut the fuck up and knock it off? Remember that thread we had a while back regarding favoritism? This to me is a shining example. Instead of passing the blame on to everyone else that can't ignore him, why not admonish the person responsible for their actions, and let them know that it really isn't appreciated? Like I said, your passive acceptance to the behavior is more enabling than any response to his posts could ever be. So the question is, is everyone who hates the game allowed to just stick around here and be a prick on purpose? or only friends.
This topic is dedicated to banning Aircraftkiller, we're just giving the opposing side. Is Aircraftkiller being annoying? Obviously, or else this wouldn't be an issue. The thing is, it IS about restraint. If people didn't pay attention to Aircraftkiller so much, he wouldn't have the desire to keep up his actions for long because he's no longer getting the desired effect and attention he's aiming for. Should Aircraftkiller and others like him be repremanded for their actions? Sure, but it shouldn't result in banning them because a bunch of people can't ignore him and his posts.
Ack made glacier. That alone should get him banned.
That I agree with. Ban Aircrafkiller for Glacier!
Crimson And you think ACK doesn't encourage conversation? If he made things so horrible, then why do you still visit here? Get off his nuts damn... hes annoying EVERYONE thinks so. What part of EVERYONE dont you understand?
The part that people like me, icedog, warranto, and such are included in "EVERYONE", and guess what? WE DON'T WANT HIM BANNED.
Lets all play the who can not respond to AircraftKiller's topic derailing remarks the longest game. Who ever doesn't respond to him the longest (Excluding members who do not regularly post here) Will recieve a mystery box with a mystery prize in it. I'm actually trying to think of a prize I could give someone, so far I am thinking some Money in my MMOG and maybe your own planet named after you. . . not really helpful to you though.
Random: How come you put spaces between your dots? Just curious.
Quote: So the question is, is everyone who hates the game allowed to just stick around here and be a prick on purpose? or only friends. We should put that to the test. I don't play Renegade that much anymore, and I can be a complete asshole when I want...
Majiin Vegeta like i said before this Link works very well
I wouldnt want him banned either if he wasnt such an Asshole and Topic De-railer. But guess what....
You know, I only had to respond once here for it to become a three page thread. Please keep it up, I have five hours to go before I pick up Sarah from the bus station and I'd love to have some constant amusement until then.
There's a delete button so you can delete your post.
Crimson If he made things so horrible, then why do you still visit here? The ocean is a several million year old fish tank that hasnt been cleaned and taste like sweat. Sure those things suck but that doesnt make the ass whipping the waves give you any less fun.
I saw a dead deer in the road off I-75. It was odd.
The only time this was a problem was when he was a moderator on the mod forums....simply cause he was deleting post's and replys. I just don't see the fun in getting him banned.....Trust me you'll miss arguing with him if he's gone....It's sort of like that idiot you pick on at work or school, once he's gone you dont have that person to pick on anymore.
I dont really care of what he does, the only thing that i want to know is why does he come to this forum, when he hates the game.
Although I already have ACK on my ignore list and cannot read his posts as of last week, I still think it is a good idea to ban him.
Titan1x77 The only time this was a problem was when he was a moderator on the mod forums....simply cause he was deleting post's and replys. I just don't see the fun in getting him banned.....Trust me you'll miss arguing with him if he's gone....It's sort of like that idiot you pick on at work or school, once he's gone you dont have that person to pick on anymore. You mean like the village idiot? Or the joker of a castle? <<
Titan does have a point. When Mike Sucich stays home I have no one to call Sausage. Nobody to say Shut up Mike, No body likes your style! at. While I'm not sure Aircraftkiller fulfills that role, it is no good to remove the people who have funny last names or do stupid things alot.
IRON FART OK then. Tell me: What is ACK's reason for coming here to annoy people? Did you ever go on irc to seeif you could get banned? Did you ever laugh because people were getting annoyed at you? I did when I first got the internet. Iwas young then, he's still doing the same thing. He's not going to get banned, get over it. I appreciate that he really pisses a lotof you guys off, but I do also realise that everyone responds. The moment he posts something it turns into a flamewar. If his comments sway off topic, ignore them. I like the way that he's even managing to laugh at this now by posting using only his last page of previous posts, the link to which was posted on here. Look at this, a 4-page thread on getting him banned, and how early on did you say he will not get banned Crimson?
It's not favoritism... I didn't and haven't banned deadfive for posting twelve million topics about his stupid website. I constantly let Vitaminous be an ass and a useless member of the forums without banning him, and I really don't like the guy at all. I let SuperFlyingLiberal stay on here even though I think he's an idiot and a waste of perfectly good oxygen. It's NOT favoritism. I don't feel it's really my place to ostracize anyone, especially the game's most prolific map maker, from the closest thing to the "official" community that we have left, unless they blatantly break the rules. Do I wish he would stop the childish, constantly, quite OLD derailing of topics for asinine reasons? You bet I do, and my hints like changing his nickname haven't helped a bit. I don't know when he'll get the message.
Crimson I didn't and haven't banned deadfive for posting twelve million topics about his stupid website. I constantly let Vitaminous be an ass and a useless member of the forums without banning him, and I really don't like the guy at all. I let SuperFlyingLiberal stay on here even though I think he's an idiot and a waste of perfectly good oxygen. No mention of my page announcements? I must be getting slack.
Sorry, though most women may do that, I don't keep a sharp memory of all the bad things people do here.
Crimson Do I wish he would stop the childish, constantly, quite OLD derailing of topics for asinine reasons? You bet I do, and my hints like changing his nickname haven't helped a bit. I don't know when he'll get the message. Swing the ban hammer. Maybe that could help shake him up a little.
msgtpain When a kid steps out of line you smack them on the butt and demand that they stop their behavior, you don't pass the blame on to those around them because then YOU are becoming the enabler. If you have no desire to enact consequences for actions because the offender is a friend, simply say that instead of pretending that it's everyone else's fault. At least then everyone will know where you stand and can shut up and move along. I quite agree with you here, on the official forums people got banned for this but the moderators didn't know who they were banning. They just knew they were fans of the game who were being jerks. creed said he got back in under a different name and was allowed, but the original idea is there: someone steps out of line, they get banned. The argument of favouritism: I think it exists everywhere; in work, school, college. I know it exists in my workplace anyway. But can you really blame the admin for being more of a friend than an "all powerful admin" when they were previously a member of the official forum and got to know people there.
ACF You know, I only had to respond once here for it to become a three page thread. This topic would have become a 3 page topic (4 now obviously) if you'd posted or not. Try to remember you're not THAT special. Anyway I don't think he should be banned, he's funny. Makes me laugh.
Are we forgetting he made Glacier? Come on now, that was obviously a slap in the face to the Renegade community.
® Are we forgetting he made Glacier? Come on now, that was obviously a slap in the face to the Renegade community. Glacier's actually a good map for clanners if you ignore the glitches it's riddled with. Compared to Islands or Hourglass, anyway.
Does anyone have any good skins for use on my game?!
There's a big difference between Glacier and Glacier Flying, learn the difference.
EXdeath7 Does anyone have any good skins for use on my game?! [over 100 shock smileys deleted] Umm...wtf is with the spam?
Aircraftkiller is very intelligent & has the ability to be above all of this. Yet, he enjoys the negative exchange. He needs to channel his intellect to more constructive things & get a job!! If he would just loosen up a little bit & accept other's flaws & informalities, then he would be very cool. He just needs a little social polishing...that's all.
I also don't agree with this idea that it's everyone else's fault but Aircraftkiller's. I mean from what I can tell, one thing that we're all agreed on is that we think it's stupid behaviour and we'd rather it didn't happen, right? Well, most of us at least. Anyway, even if we did as has been suggested and ignore him, what is to stop him from continuing regardless? Besides which, from my perspective, the people who are asking him to stop are doing because of a desire to see the forum function in a pleasant and civilised manner. Aircraftkiller is posting out of a desire to annoy people just because he can... and also I assume because he doesn't care about the consequences of his actions with regards to other people. So run this by me one more time... it's perfectly acceptable for Aircraftkiller to act like he does, but everyone else is in the wrong for behaving like a good society does... and that would be trying to enforce what is the generally accepted code of conduct (i.e. morality, treating people with respect, whatever you want to call it)? I didn't realise that when we think something is wrong we should just ignore it because it will go away on it's own.
We never said that he's not at fault for his own actions. Also, if we do ignore him, he'll just be talking to himself, and that WILL fix the problem.
That, and if you sit back and look at these little flamewars, they're actually quite amusing. Amusing in that people have been getting into stupid arguments with ACK since Ren came out, and probably before that, and they STILL haven't learned to just ignore him. Which is even more incredibly fucking pathetic considering that there's an ignore feature now. And when something is THAT pathetic, one just can't help but laugh their ass off at it. :rolleyes:
It only fixes the problem for those who are already here. There have been a few times where it all kicked off because a Newbie came in and wondered why this aircraftkiller was being such a dick to them. What are they going to have, an FAQ telling them that they should put him on their ignore list right away... it's not their fault, they just don't know any better. I would rather any one new can start off ok, until they - fit in - or make an ass of them selfs. I'm not for banning, I just like clean and relatively friendly forums.
These forums haven't been "clean and relatively friendly" since...ever.
Ar4wn weirdo You keep me out of this. I'm watching from the outside.
He's not going to be around until May 6th (supposedly) -- so we get a reprieve anyway.
msgtpain Warranto: Instead of telling everyone it's their fault for not being able to ignore it, why not at least publicly tell Ack to shut the fuck up and knock it off? Remember that thread we had a while back regarding favoritism? This to me is a shining example. Instead of passing the blame on to everyone else that can't ignore him, why not admonish the person responsible for their actions, and let them know that it really isn't appreciated? Like I said, your passive acceptance to the behavior is more enabling than any response to his posts could ever be. So the question is, is everyone who hates the game allowed to just stick around here and be a prick on purpose? or only friends. Why do I suggest that it is their fault? Perhaps because it IS their fault. This is a forum where words must be written to respond. If it were completely verbal, it would be much more difficult to have someone hanging around mentioning stuff. In such a case, I'd be more than happy to tell him to shut up. However, thanks to the wonders of modern technology, there is an "ignore button". If you don't want him to interrupt topics, hit that button. It's quite simple. It takes two to start a "fight" (or in this case, detract from the topic), if Aircraftkiller is to be blamed for it, then so is everyone who entices it to continue. The blame goes both ways here. Since you enjoy bringing up events from real life and applying them to this, Imagine that "bully" who keeps stating "Common, fight me!", over and over again. The only way a fight is going to occur, is if someone acts on that. Sure, that bully may be to blame for enticing someone to the fight, however just as much blame goes to the person who decided to fight. Heck, if you actually WANT me to though, I could start showing favortism. Perhaps then you'll have at least a valid claim to complain about. Until then, get off this elevated position you have given yourself, and realize that YOU are as much to blame for your off-topic comments regarding Aircraftkiller as he is for starting the "fight".
If ACk is openly allowed (no fault) to post negative responses to any topic he desires with no consequences, I'm having a hard time seeing how anyone that responds to him is at fault for their actions.. Please explain. Oh, and if you need to jump on my "high horse" and prove you can play favorites, go right ahead. Quote: In such a case, I'd be more than happy to tell him to shut up. However, thanks to the wonders of modern technology, there is an "ignore button". If you don't want him to interrupt topics, hit that button. It's quite simple. So let me get this straight.. just so there is no missinterpretation on my part. If we were talking face to face, what ACK constantly does would warrant (no pun intended) a response of "shut up" from you. However, since we have another feature called "ignore", it is our fault if he continues, and there is no reason for you to tell him to "shut up".. Did I get that right? Since we're in to "real world examples" lets have another.. If my daughter sees a mans 10 inch erect cock on the side of the road, it's her fault for looking at it, and we should just ignore the person standing there nude, after all.. she has a neck, she should use it.